On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 21:20 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 13:16 +0200, Iago Toral wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 20:59 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:04 +0200, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We totally ignored
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 13:16 +0200, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 20:59 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:04 +0200, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > >
> > > We totally ignored this before because there were no piglit tests
> > > for
> > > indirect loads in
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 20:59 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:04 +0200, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> >
> > We totally ignored this before because there were no piglit tests
> > for
> > indirect loads in tessellation stages with doubles.
> >
> > Cc: "12.0"
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 20:59 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:04 +0200, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > We totally ignored this before because there were no piglit tests
> > for
> > indirect loads in tessellation stages with doubles.
> >
> > Cc: "12.0"
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 11:04 +0200, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> We totally ignored this before because there were no piglit tests for
> indirect loads in tessellation stages with doubles.
>
> Cc: "12.0"
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp | 86
>
We totally ignored this before because there were no piglit tests for
indirect loads in tessellation stages with doubles.
Cc: "12.0"
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp | 86
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 22