On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2016 5:39 AM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>>
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> Not entirely sure how we didn't hit this before, but dropping the const
>> initializer on the floor is obviously not correct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
>> ---
On Jun 25, 2016 5:39 AM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Not entirely sure how we didn't hit this before, but dropping the const
> initializer on the floor is obviously not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> No idea why i965 even still uses this pass, vs nir scalarizing pas
From: Rob Clark
Not entirely sure how we didn't hit this before, but dropping the const
initializer on the floor is obviously not correct.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
No idea why i965 even still uses this pass, vs nir scalarizing pass.
So might want to drop this. But I figured fixing it first
