Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
---
src/mesa/x86/x86_function_opt.h | 42 +
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 src/mesa/x86/x86_function_opt.h
Using a macro like this means we can easily enable runtime support in
I rather to not use compiler specific hacks in mesa. If it was a
personal pet project it would make sense.
Best regards,
Siavash Eliasi.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Siavash Eliasi siavashser...@gmail.com wrote:
I rather to not use compiler specific hacks in mesa. If it was a personal
pet project it would make sense.
We use compiler-specific things all the time. That's not going to change.
On 08/11/14 11:12, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
As long as it fixes odd combinations such as this the following I'm all
in favour of using such an approach. It will save us quite a few
lovely details - split the file, configure checks etc...
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 18:13 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 08/11/14 11:12, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
As long as it fixes odd combinations such as this the following I'm all
in favour of using such an approach. It will save us quite a few
lovely
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:29 +0330, Siavash Eliasi wrote:
I rather to not use compiler specific hacks in mesa. If it was a
personal pet project it would make sense.
Best regards,
Siavash Eliasi.
Having to work around compiler differences is a real world problem. As
has been pointed out
I know that's a time saver for developer (gcc function multi
versioning), however I still do prefer the approach (my own ^^ ) which
works on all setups regardless of hardware and compiler (well, any sane
compiler ICC, GCC, Clang,...).
Best regards,
Siavash Eliasi.
On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 08:59 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 18:13 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 08/11/14 11:12, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
As long as it fixes odd combinations such as this the following I'm all
in favour
On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 07:48 +0330, Siavash Eliasi wrote:
I know that's a time saver for developer (gcc function multi
versioning), however I still do prefer the approach (my own ^^ ) which
works on all setups regardless of hardware and compiler (well, any sane
compiler ICC, GCC, Clang,...).
