Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-06-15 19:45:19)
> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:41:39 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-06-14 22:49:01)
> > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 6:01:33 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > If we know the bo is idle (that is we have no submitted a command
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:41:39 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-06-14 22:49:01)
> > On Friday, June 9, 2017 6:01:33 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > If we know the bo is idle (that is we have no submitted a command buffer
> > > referencing this bo since the last
Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-06-14 22:49:01)
> On Friday, June 9, 2017 6:01:33 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If we know the bo is idle (that is we have no submitted a command buffer
> > referencing this bo since the last query) we can skip asking the kernel.
> > Note this may report a false
On Friday, June 9, 2017 6:01:33 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> If we know the bo is idle (that is we have no submitted a command buffer
> referencing this bo since the last query) we can skip asking the kernel.
> Note this may report a false negative if the target is being shared
> between processes
If we know the bo is idle (that is we have no submitted a command buffer
referencing this bo since the last query) we can skip asking the kernel.
Note this may report a false negative if the target is being shared
between processes (exported via dmabuf or flink). To allow the caller
control over
