I only had time to skim through your changes but the series looks great, Roland.
If it's not too much trouble, could you please add a piglit test for explicit
cube derivatives? Also, please confirm there are no piglit regressions.
Jose
- Original Message -
From: Roland Scheidegger
From: Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
This is trivial now, though need to make sure we pass all the necessary
derivative values (which is 3 each for ddx/ddy not 2).
Untested (no piglit test) however since the transform works the same
as implicit derivatives this should probably work
