On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 5:41:37 PM PDT Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 3:54:14 PM PDT Matt Turner wrote:
> > Ken suggested instead of a big and complicated optimization pass, to
> > just recognize the operations here. It's certainly less code and a lot
> > prettier, but it
On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 3:54:14 PM PDT Matt Turner wrote:
> Ken suggested instead of a big and complicated optimization pass, to
> just recognize the operations here. It's certainly less code and a lot
> prettier, but it seems to actually perform worse for currently unknown
> reasons.
One
Ken suggested instead of a big and complicated optimization pass, to
just recognize the operations here. It's certainly less code and a lot
prettier, but it seems to actually perform worse for currently unknown
reasons.
total instructions in shared programs: 8514403 -> 8495373 (-0.22%)