On Wednesday 04 March 2015, Laura Ekstrand wrote:
> This could have added a new DD table entry for ReadBuffer that takes an
> arbitrary read buffer, but, after looking at the existing DD functions,
> Kenneth Graunke recommended that we just skip calling the DD functions in the
> case of ARB_direct_
This could have added a new DD table entry for ReadBuffer that takes an
arbitrary read buffer, but, after looking at the existing DD functions,
Kenneth Graunke recommended that we just skip calling the DD functions in the
case of ARB_direct_state_access. The DD implementations for ReadBuffer
have
