On Wednesday 04 March 2015, Laura Ekstrand wrote:
> This could have added a new DD table entry for DrawBuffers that takes an
> arbitrary draw buffer, but, after looking at the existing DD functions,
> Kenneth Graunke recommended that we just skip calling the DD functions in the
> case of ARB_direct
This could have added a new DD table entry for DrawBuffers that takes an
arbitrary draw buffer, but, after looking at the existing DD functions,
Kenneth Graunke recommended that we just skip calling the DD functions in the
case of ARB_direct_state_access. The DD implementations for DrawBuffer(s)
h
