On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Antía Puentes wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On mar, 2015-06-30 at 14:18 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
>> > From: Antia Puentes
>> >
>> > For operations that have a predefined operand size > 0, defined in
>> >
Hi Jason,
On mar, 2015-06-30 at 14:18 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> > From: Antia Puentes
> >
> > For operations that have a predefined operand size > 0, defined in
> > glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.c, NIR returns a swizzle containing zeros in
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> From: Antia Puentes
>
> For operations that have a predefined operand size > 0, defined in
> glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.c, NIR returns a swizzle containing zeros in the
> components from outside the source vector. However, the driver
> expect
From: Antia Puentes
For operations that have a predefined operand size > 0, defined in
glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.c, NIR returns a swizzle containing zeros in the
components from outside the source vector. However, the driver
expects those components to have a swizzle value equal to the swizzle
of the
