On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On BDW+, the negation source modifier on NOT, AND, OR, and XOR, i
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>> On BDW+, the negation source modifier on NOT, AND, OR, and XOR, is actually
>>> a boolean negate and not an integer negate.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On BDW+, the negation source modifier on NOT, AND, OR, and XOR, is actually
>> a boolean negate and not an integer negate. However, NIR's soruce
>> modifiers are the integer version.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On BDW+, the negation source modifier on NOT, AND, OR, and XOR, is actually
> a boolean negate and not an integer negate. However, NIR's soruce
> modifiers are the integer version. We have to resolve it with a MOV prior
> to emitting the ac
On BDW+, the negation source modifier on NOT, AND, OR, and XOR, is actually
a boolean negate and not an integer negate. However, NIR's soruce
modifiers are the integer version. We have to resolve it with a MOV prior
to emitting the actual instruction. This is basically the same thing we do
in th
