On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 17:43 -0400, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> > The heuristic we're using is rather lame, since it assumes everything is
> > non-uniform and loops execute 50 times, but it should be enough for
> > measuring
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> The heuristic we're using is rather lame, since it assumes everything is
> non-uniform and loops execute 50 times, but it should be enough for
> measuring improvements in the scheduler that don't result in a change in
>
The heuristic we're using is rather lame, since it assumes everything is
non-uniform and loops execute 50 times, but it should be enough for
measuring improvements in the scheduler that don't result in a change in
the number of instructions.
Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott
---