On Mon 04 May 2015, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1 May 2015 at 21:02, Chad Versace wrote:
> > +static bool
> > +brw_fence_has_completed(struct brw_fence *fence)
> > +{
> > + if (fence->signalled)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + if (fence->batch_bo && !drm_intel_bo_busy(fence->batch_bo
Hi,
On 1 May 2015 at 21:02, Chad Versace wrote:
> +static bool
> +brw_fence_has_completed(struct brw_fence *fence)
> +{
> + if (fence->signalled)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (fence->batch_bo && !drm_intel_bo_busy(fence->batch_bo)) {
> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(fence->batch_bo);
> +
From: Chad Versace
This enables EGL_KHR_fence_sync and EGL_KHR_wait_sync.
Below is the difference in piglit results, before and after this patch.
No regressions and several tests improve from 'skip' to 'pass'. Out of
EGL_KHR_fence_sync tests, two of the multithreaded tests skip; all other
tests
