subject:"\[Mesa\-dev\] \[PATCH V3 00\/13\] ARB_draw_indirect for i965"

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V3 00/13] ARB_draw_indirect for i965

2013-11-11 Thread Chris Forbes

Thanks, Paul. Now just seeking r-b for 1, 6, and 12. Anyone? On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Paul Berry wrote: > On 9 November 2013 01:02, Chris Forbes wrote: >> >> This series adds support for ARB_draw_indirect and ARB_multi_draw_indirect >> on Gen7+. >> >> Big changes: >> - Get rid of overco

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V3 00/13] ARB_draw_indirect for i965

2013-11-11 Thread Paul Berry

On 9 November 2013 01:02, Chris Forbes wrote: > This series adds support for ARB_draw_indirect and ARB_multi_draw_indirect > on Gen7+. > > Big changes: > - Get rid of overcomplicated state tracking for the indirect bo in i965. > - Make primcount==0 produce GL_INVALID_VALUE in MultiDraw*Indirect >

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH V3 00/13] ARB_draw_indirect for i965

2013-11-09 Thread Chris Forbes

This series adds support for ARB_draw_indirect and ARB_multi_draw_indirect on Gen7+. Big changes: - Get rid of overcomplicated state tracking for the indirect bo in i965. - Make primcount==0 produce GL_INVALID_VALUE in MultiDraw*Indirect - Small tidyups for clarity __