Heya,
On 2018-05-01 18:44, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Robert Foss wrote:
Hey Rob,
On 2018-05-01 04:20, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Robert Foss
wrote:
From: Rob Herring
Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Robert Foss wrote:
> Hey Rob,
>
>
> On 2018-05-01 04:20, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Robert Foss
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Rob Herring
>>>
>>> Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided by
>>> 2 different grall
Hey Rob,
On 2018-05-01 04:20, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Robert Foss wrote:
From: Rob Herring
Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided by
2 different gralloc implementations is problematic because we have a
dependency on a specific gralloc
Hey,
On 2018-05-01 08:29, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:20 AM Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Robert Foss
wrote:
From: Rob Herring
[snip]
@@ -1228,20 +1254,31 @@ dri2_initialize_android(_EGLDriver *drv,
_EGLDisplay *disp)
dri2_dpy->is_render_no
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:20 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Robert Foss
wrote:
> > From: Rob Herring
[snip]
> > @@ -1228,20 +1254,31 @@ dri2_initialize_android(_EGLDriver *drv,
_EGLDisplay *disp)
> >
> > dri2_dpy->is_render_node = drmGetNodeTypeFromFd(dri2_dpy->fd)
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Robert Foss wrote:
> From: Rob Herring
>
> Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided by
> 2 different gralloc implementations is problematic because we have a
> dependency on a specific gralloc implementation header.
>
> This mostly disa
From: Rob Herring
Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided by
2 different gralloc implementations is problematic because we have a
dependency on a specific gralloc implementation header.
This mostly disables the dependency on the gralloc implementation and
headers. Th
