Am Montag, den 06.08.2018, 16:59 +0100 schrieb Eric Engestrom:
> On Monday, 2018-08-06 09:41:48 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > os.path.exists doesn't return True for stale symlinks, but they are
> > in
> > the way later, when a link/file with the same name is to be
> > created.
> > For instance it
Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-08-06 08:59:00)
> On Monday, 2018-08-06 09:41:48 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > os.path.exists doesn't return True for stale symlinks, but they are in
> > the way later, when a link/file with the same name is to be created.
> > For instance it is conceivable that the
On Monday, 2018-08-06 09:41:48 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> os.path.exists doesn't return True for stale symlinks, but they are in
> the way later, when a link/file with the same name is to be created.
> For instance it is conceivable that the pointed to file is replaced by
> a file with a new
os.path.exists doesn't return True for stale symlinks, but they are in
the way later, when a link/file with the same name is to be created.
For instance it is conceivable that the pointed to file is replaced by
a file with a new name, and then the symlink is dead.
To handle this check
