Hello Matt,
We have pushed all the patches except the last one...
> * i965/gen7: expose OpenGL 4.0 on Haswell
>
> We are currently discussing it with Curro :-)
>
We plan to send another patch series with the needed changes to enable
OpenGL 4.0 on Haswell and all the suggestions we got from K
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 12:13 -0600, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 15:21 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > i965/vec4: add a helper function to create double immediates
> > >
> > > Can leave for later: Shouldn't
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 15:21 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
>> i965/vec4: add a helper function to create double immediates
>>
>> Can leave for later: Shouldn't we use the DIM instruction (on
>> HSW)?
>>
>> I'm not sur
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
>> i965/disasm: fix subreg for dst in Align16 mode
>
> I just noticed that this commit has a rebase mistake. Tim changed the
> code in July to use PRIu64, but this patch reverts bac
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> i965/disasm: fix subreg for dst in Align16 mode
I just noticed that this commit has a rebase mistake. Tim changed the
code in July to use PRIu64, but this patch reverts back to %u.
___
mesa-
On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 11:31 -0600, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
> wrote:
> > Hello Matt,
> >
> > We have done most of the suggestions you made to our patches.
> > However,
> > we have replied to some of your questions/suggestions and we are
> > w
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
wrote:
> Hello Matt,
>
> We have done most of the suggestions you made to our patches. However,
> we have replied to some of your questions/suggestions and we are
> waiting for a reply before marking them as R-b or not.
Thank you guys so
Hello Matt,
We have done most of the suggestions you made to our patches. However,
we have replied to some of your questions/suggestions and we are
waiting for a reply before marking them as R-b or not.
You can clone the new version of the patch series by running this
command:
$ git clone -b i96
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez writes:
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 09:01 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
>>
> [...]
>> > i965/vec4/nir: implement double comparisons
>> >
>> >Trivial: A newline before the if() would be nice.
>> >
>> >I have a memory of Curro telling me that the hardware
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 13:22 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 15:00 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> > i965/vec4: handle 32 and 64 bit channels in liveness analysis
> >
> > Please indent the returned multiline expressions in
> > var_from_reg() like we do elsew
On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 15:00 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> i965/vec4: handle 32 and 64 bit channels in liveness analysis
>
> Please indent the returned multiline expressions in
> var_from_reg() like we do elsewhere, so that the second line
> begins on the same column as the first li
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 09:01 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
>
[...]
> > i965/vec4/nir: implement double comparisons
> >
> > Trivial: A newline before the if() would be nice.
> >
> > I have a memory of Curro telling me that the hardware maps each
> > 32-bit chunk in the dst to
Hello Matt!
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 15:21 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> On 10/11, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > It's been some time since
>
> ... anyone has reviewed your patches. Sorry. :(
>
> I'm going to review from your rebased i965-fp64-gen7-scalar-vec4-rc2
> branch. There have probably been so
i965/vec4: handle 32 and 64 bit channels in liveness analysis
Please indent the returned multiline expressions in
var_from_reg() like we do elsewhere, so that the second line
begins on the same column as the first line.
*/ goes on its own line.
I'm having
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 15:21 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> On 10/11, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> >
> > It's been some time since
> ... anyone has reviewed your patches. Sorry. :(
>
> I'm going to review from your rebased i965-fp64-gen7-scalar-vec4-rc2
> branch. There have probably been some reorderi
On 10/11, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
It's been some time since
... anyone has reviewed your patches. Sorry. :(
I'm going to review from your rebased i965-fp64-gen7-scalar-vec4-rc2
branch. There have probably been some reorderings or other changes due
to rebasing since the patches were sent, so
It's been some time since we sent the first version of the patches, so here is
a v2, which adds:
1. Feedback from Curro to v1. I think the only thing missing is the suggestion
to change the semantics of the offset() helper in vec4 to match those in the
scalar backend. I sent this as a separate ser
17 matches
Mail list logo