Kenneth Graunke writes:
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 7:33:02 AM PDT Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
>>
>> On 09/05/16 07:21, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:56:08AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gons?lvez wrote:
>> >> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 6
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 07:33:02AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gons?lvez wrote:
>
>
> On 09/05/16 07:21, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:56:08AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gons?lvez wrote:
> >> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 64-bit
> >> data type size
On Monday, May 9, 2016 7:33:02 AM PDT Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
>
> On 09/05/16 07:21, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:56:08AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gons?lvez wrote:
> >> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 64-bit
> >> data type sizes, the
On 09/05/16 07:21, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:56:08AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gons?lvez wrote:
>> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 64-bit
>> data type sizes, the driver ends up doing misaligned access to double
>> based variables in the push
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:56:08AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gons?lvez wrote:
> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 64-bit
> data type sizes, the driver ends up doing misaligned access to double
> based variables in the push constant buffer.
>
> To fix this, this patch pushe
On 07/05/16 09:22, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2016-05-05 23:56:08, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
>> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 64-bit
>> data type sizes, the driver ends up doing misaligned access to double
>> based variables in the push constant buffer.
>>
>>
On 2016-05-05 23:56:08, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 64-bit
> data type sizes, the driver ends up doing misaligned access to double
> based variables in the push constant buffer.
>
> To fix this, this patch pushes first all the 64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Kenneth gave his R-b to this patch on IRC:
"i965/fs: push first double-based uniforms in push constant
buffer" gets my R-b
On 06/05/16 08:56, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or
> 64-bit
When there is a mix of definitions of uniforms with 32-bit or 64-bit
data type sizes, the driver ends up doing misaligned access to double
based variables in the push constant buffer.
To fix this, this patch pushes first all the 64-bit variables and
then the rest. Then, all the variables would be
