On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Ilia Mirkin
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ilia Mirkin
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Currently any access params (cohe
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ilia Mirkin
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently any access params (coherent/volatile/restrict) are being lost
> >> when lowering to the ssbo load
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> Currently any access params (coherent/volatile/restrict) are being lost
>> when lowering to the ssbo load/store intrinsics. Keep track of the
>> variable being used, and bake it
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Currently any access params (coherent/volatile/restrict) are being lost
> when lowering to the ssbo load/store intrinsics. Keep track of the
> variable being used, and bake its access params in as the last arg of
> the load/store intrinsics.
Currently any access params (coherent/volatile/restrict) are being lost
when lowering to the ssbo load/store intrinsics. Keep track of the
variable being used, and bake its access params in as the last arg of
the load/store intrinsics.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
This is RFC because there are
