On 14 April 2016 at 01:37, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 13.04.2016 um 03:35 schrieb eocallag...@alterapraxis.com:
>> On 2016-04-11 22:27, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>>> Am 10.04.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Edward O'Callaghan:
All the piglits pass for these two as-is. However, some of the piglits
>
Am 13.04.2016 um 03:35 schrieb eocallag...@alterapraxis.com:
> On 2016-04-11 22:27, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Am 10.04.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Edward O'Callaghan:
>>> All the piglits pass for these two as-is. However, some of the piglits
>>> require SSBO support to run, although I can't see why an
On 2016-04-11 22:27, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 10.04.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Edward O'Callaghan:
All the piglits pass for these two as-is. However, some of the piglits
require SSBO support to run, although I can't see why anything would
actually fail but I thought I would make note of it just i
Am 10.04.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Edward O'Callaghan:
> All the piglits pass for these two as-is. However, some of the piglits
> require SSBO support to run, although I can't see why anything would
> actually fail but I thought I would make note of it just in case someone
> felt this patch should be h
All the piglits pass for these two as-is. However, some of the piglits
require SSBO support to run, although I can't see why anything would
actually fail but I thought I would make note of it just in case someone
felt this patch should be held back till SSBO support is in both pipe
drivers? If not,
