Hi Tomasz,
I submitted a new patch to enhance the pbuffer implementation.
Please check if it satisfy your requirement.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/123848/
Thanks,
Zhiquan,
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
hursday, November 24, 2016 11:05 AM
>> To: Long, Zhifang <zhifang.l...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Liu, Zhiquan <zhiquan@intel.com>; Palli, Tapani
>> <tapani.pa...@intel.com>; Xu, Randy <randy...@intel.com>; Emil Velikov
>> <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com&g
> To: Long, Zhifang <zhifang.l...@intel.com>
> Cc: Liu, Zhiquan <zhiquan@intel.com>; Palli, Tapani
> <tapani.pa...@intel.com>; Xu, Randy <randy...@intel.com>; Emil Velikov
> <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>; Kondapally, Kalyan
> <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>;
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Zhifang,
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Long, Zhifang
> wrote:
>>> >> > @@ -353,6 +353,18 @@ droid_destroy_surface(_EGLDriver *drv,
>>> >> _EGLDisplay *disp, _EGLSurface *surf)
>>> >> >
Hi Zhifang,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Long, Zhifang wrote:
>> >> > @@ -353,6 +353,18 @@ droid_destroy_surface(_EGLDriver *drv,
>> >> _EGLDisplay *disp, _EGLSurface *surf)
>> >> >dri2_surf->window->common.decRef(_surf->window-
>> >common);
>> >> > }
>>
<zhiquan@intel.com>; Xu, Randy <randy...@intel.com>; Emil Velikov
> <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>; Kondapally, Kalyan
> <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>; ML mesa-dev
> <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] EGL/android: pbuffer imple
.@chromium.org>
Cc: Long, Zhifang <zhifang.l...@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiquan
<zhiquan@intel.com>; Xu, Randy <randy...@intel.com>; Emil Velikov
<emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>; Kondapally, Kalyan <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>;
ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
apally, Kalyan <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>; ML mesa-dev
<mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] EGL/android: pbuffer implementation.
On 11/22/2016 08:39 AM, Xu, Randy wrote:
Hi ,Tapani
With this pbuffer patch, only three EGL dEQP failure remained on
Android platfor
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Liu, Zhiquan wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> Thanks for you commends.
>> >
>>
>> Looks like this patch has already landed, but please let me try to
>> confirm some things here anyway. Would you mind keeping me on CC for
>> any future patches for the
.com>; ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] EGL/android: pbuffer implementation.
On 11/22/2016 08:08 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 11/22/2016 08:02 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Tapani Pälli
<tapani.pa...@intel.com>
wrote:
On 11/22/2016 08:08 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 11/22/2016 08:02 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Tapani Pälli
wrote:
On 11/21/2016 04:15 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi,
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for you commends.
> >
>
> Looks like this patch has already landed, but please let me try to
> confirm some things here anyway. Would you mind keeping me on CC for
> any future patches for the EGL/Android module? (I believe
> scripts/get_reviewer.pl should already include me
On 11/22/2016 08:02 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 11/21/2016 04:15 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/2016 04:15 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan
>>>
On 11/21/2016 04:15 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan wrote:
mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
fix most deqp and cts
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan wrote:
>>> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add
On 21 November 2016 at 14:36, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan wrote:
>>> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add
On 21 November 2016 at 07:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan wrote:
>> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
>> fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
>> add single buffer
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Liu Zhiquan wrote:
> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
> fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
> add single buffer config to support pbuffer, and create image for
> pbuffer when pbuffer type
mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
add single buffer config to support pbuffer, and create image for
pbuffer when pbuffer type is front surface.
The EGL 1.5 spec states that pbuffers have a back buffer but no front
On 14 November 2016 at 11:49, Liu Zhiquan wrote:
> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
> fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
> add support of front buffer and single buffer config.
>
> Test status: android CTS EGL pbuffer test can
mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
add support of front buffer and single buffer config.
Test status: android CTS EGL pbuffer test can run without native crash.
test:[DEQP,EGL]all deqp pbuffer case passed.
V2: remove
Hi Randy,
On 11 November 2016 at 01:22, Xu, Randy wrote:
> Hi, Emil
>
> I may misunderstand your meaning, you want to Zhiquan to refine the code and
> avoid duplicating those identical codes, right?
> In this case, I agree with you fully
>
There two distinct things
- try to
an <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>; Xu,
Randy <randy...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] EGL/android: pbuffer implementation.
On 10 November 2016 at 11:48, Liu Zhiquan <zhiquan@intel.com> wrote:
> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
> fix most
<emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>; Liu, Zhiquan
<zhiquan@intel.com>
Cc: ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Long, Zhifang
<zhifang.l...@intel.com>; Kondapally, Kalyan <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>; Xu,
Randy <randy...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Mesa-dev] EGL/
On 10 November 2016 at 11:48, Liu Zhiquan wrote:
> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
> fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
> add support of front buffer and single buffer config.
>
> Test status: android CTS EGL pbuffer test can
+Chad
On Nov 10, 2016 3:53 AM, "Liu Zhiquan" wrote:
> mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
> fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
> add support of front buffer and single buffer config.
>
> Test status: android CTS EGL pbuffer test
mesa android path didn't support pbuffer, so add pbuffer support to
fix most deqp and cts pbuffer test cases fail;
add support of front buffer and single buffer config.
Test status: android CTS EGL pbuffer test can run without native crash.
test:[DEQP,EGL]all deqp pbuffer case passed.
29 matches
Mail list logo