Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-18 Thread Ian Romanick
On 11/14/2014 07:07 AM, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use >> a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? >> >> Eg. >> mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-17 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14/11/14 14:39, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.4.0 -> 10

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-17 Thread Emil Velikov
On 15/11/14 17:50, Marek Olšák wrote: > I've always found the X.Org versioning scheme unintuitive. This is > actually for the first time after ~5 years of contributing to open > source graphics that I finally understand how the X versioning works. > Granted, I had never been interested in it anyway

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-17 Thread Emil Velikov
On 15/11/14 17:44, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> On 14 November 2014 19:50, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov >>> wrote: Hello all, This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-15 Thread Marek Olšák
I've always found the X.Org versioning scheme unintuitive. This is actually for the first time after ~5 years of contributing to open source graphics that I finally understand how the X versioning works. Granted, I had never been interested in it anyway. If you need to have a web page on x.org tha

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-15 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 14 November 2014 19:50, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use >>> a more conventional numbering for th

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-15 Thread Alan Coopersmith
If it helps explain things, X.Org's versioning scheme is documented in: http://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/xorg-docs/Versions.html -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-15 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14 November 2014 19:50, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use >> a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? >> >> Eg. >> mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-15 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14 November 2014 16:48, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> On 14/11/14 15:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov >>> wrote: Hello all, This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Am 14.11.2014 um 15:39 schrieb Emil Velikov: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.4.0

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On Friday, November 14, 2014 02:39:24 PM Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... >

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 14/11/14 15:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use >>> a more conventional numbering for the develo

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 14 November 2014 15:07, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Emil Velikov > wrote: > > Are there any objections if I move to the above format starting with > > mesa 10.4-rc1 ? I would appreciate any feedback over the next 2-3 days, > > and based on it I'll tag the fir

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14/11/14 15:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use >> a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? >> >> Eg. >> mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14/11/14 15:07, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use >> a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? >> >> Eg. >> mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.

Re: [Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Erik Faye-Lund
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello all, > > This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use > a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? > > Eg. > mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 > mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 > ... > mesa 10.

[Mesa-dev] Move mesa version scheme to a more common style ?

2014-11-14 Thread Emil Velikov
Hello all, This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ? Eg. mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 ... mesa 10.4.0 -> 10.4.0 mesa 10.4.1-rc1 -> 10.4.0.901 ... you get the idea. A