On 19/11/14 21:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Jose Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
On 19/11/14 19:45, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net writes:
This series removes a bunch of
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net writes:
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future patch series deleting more, I hope that discussion doesn't
derail the review process for these changes.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net writes:
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future patch series deleting more, I hope
On 19/11/14 19:32, Eric Anholt wrote:
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net writes:
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future patch series deleting more, I hope that discussion doesn't
derail
On 19/11/14 19:45, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net writes:
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Jose Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
On 19/11/14 19:45, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net writes:
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
The patch attached should do it.
just small nitpick, please drop /* for radeons */ comment from DP2ADD,
thanks
Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg da...@ixit.cz
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
...@lists.freedesktop.org on behalf of Brian Paul
bri...@vmware.com
Sent: 13 November 2014 16:27
To: Eric Anholt; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
On 11/12/2014 06:18 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes
@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future patch series deleting more, I hope that discussion doesn't
derail
From: mesa-dev mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org on behalf of Eric
Anholt e...@anholt.net
Sent: 13 November 2014 01:43
To: Ilia Mirkin
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu
On 11/12/2014 06:18 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future patch series deleting more, I hope that discussion doesn't
derail the review process for these
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu writes:
AFAIK at least some of these (NRM, ARR, probably others) were being used by
the d3d9 state tracker. Not sure what its status is, but I believe the hope
This looks good to me. Other candidates for removal:
SUB (same as ADD with the Negate bit inverted)
CLAMP (same as MIN+MAX), some drivers don't implement this
ABS (same as MOV with the Abs bit set)
Marek
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
This series removes
on behalf of Eric
Anholt e...@anholt.net
Sent: 13 November 2014 01:43
To: Ilia Mirkin
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu writes:
AFAIK at least some of these (NRM, ARR, probably others) were being
November 2014 01:43
To: Ilia Mirkin
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu writes:
AFAIK at least some of these (NRM, ARR, probably others) were being used by
the d3d9 state tracker. Not sure what its
@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
As long as we have NAND, pretty much anything can be lowered to
that... I am, of course, not advocating keeping around every insane
instruction, but it does seem a bit arbitrary as to which ones we have
and which
From: Jose Fonseca
Sent: 13 November 2014 13:06
To: Eric Anholt; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
Thanks for doing this. It's has been long overdue.
Unfortunately we are relying on TGSI_OPCODE_CND/TGSI_OPCODE_ARR internally.
I'm
: 13 November 2014 01:18
To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Mesa-dev] Removing unused opcodes (TGSI, Mesa IR)
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future patch series deleting
This series removes a bunch of unused opcodes, mostly from TGSI. It
doesn't go as far as we could possibly go -- while I welcome discussion
for future patch series deleting more, I hope that discussion doesn't
derail the review process for these changes.
I haven't messed with the subroutine
AFAIK at least some of these (NRM, ARR, probably others) were being used by
the d3d9 state tracker. Not sure what its status is, but I believe the hope
was to eventually get it into the tree.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
This series removes a bunch of
Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu writes:
AFAIK at least some of these (NRM, ARR, probably others) were being used by
the d3d9 state tracker. Not sure what its status is, but I believe the hope
was to eventually get it into the tree.
They've got code for lowering NRM and CND to sanity, and no
21 matches
Mail list logo
