On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 02:30 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 02:18 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> >> > However, I think this can be a problem in your case, because you can't
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 02:18 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
>> > However, I think this can be a problem in your case, because you can't
>> > remap the block index if you don't know how many blocks i
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 02:18 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> > However, I think this can be a problem in your case, because you can't
> > remap the block index if you don't know how many blocks in UniformBlocks
> > before the one you are processing ar
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> However, I think this can be a problem in your case, because you can't
> remap the block index if you don't know how many blocks in UniformBlocks
> before the one you are processing are of a different type (i.e. UBOs if
> this is an SSBO or the o
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 11:27 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 02:34 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:19 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> >> On Tue,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 02:34 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:19 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
>> >> > Hi ilia,
>>
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 11:54 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Iago Toral writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:41 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> Ilia Mirkin writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> >> >> Hi ilia,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0
Iago Toral writes:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:41 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Ilia Mirkin writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
>> >> Hi ilia,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> >>> Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
>> >>>
>>
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 18:41 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Ilia Mirkin writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> >> Hi ilia,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >>> Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering why the dec
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 02:34 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:19 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> >> > Hi ilia,
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:19 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
>> > Hi ilia,
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> >> Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
>> >>
>> >> I wa
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 11:19 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> > Hi ilia,
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
> >>
> >> I was wondering why the decision was made to stick SSBO's onto th
Ilia Mirkin writes:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
>> Hi ilia,
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
>>>
>>> I was wondering why the decision was made to stick SSBO's onto the
>>> same list as constbufs. Seems li
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> Hi ilia,
>
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
>>
>> I was wondering why the decision was made to stick SSBO's onto the
>> same list as constbufs. Seems like they're entirely separate en
Hi ilia,
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
>
> I was wondering why the decision was made to stick SSBO's onto the
> same list as constbufs. Seems like they're entirely separate entities,
> no? Perhaps I'm missing something?
The reason for
Hi Samuel, and any other onlookers,
I was wondering why the decision was made to stick SSBO's onto the
same list as constbufs. Seems like they're entirely separate entities,
no? Perhaps I'm missing something?
Thanks,
-ilia
___
mesa-dev mailing list
m
16 matches
Mail list logo