Like Emil said, it depends on the feature. For example, the r300
hardware can do GL_ARB_clip_control from GL 4.5, but cannot do
GL_EXT_texture_array from GL 3.0. The driver doesn't support
GL_ARB_clip_control yet.
Marek
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Romain Failliot
wrote:
> So right now, if it
IMHO all the red blocks should stand for "not implemented". Whether "$driver
could do it or not" that is highly individual and depends on the
feature/extension and the actual hardware.
-Emil
P.S. I don't work on the radeon drivers.
On 05/09/14 20:54, Romain Failliot wrote:
> So right now, if it's
So right now, if it's red it really means that the r300 could do it, but
it's not been implemented yet?
2014-09-05 11:12 GMT-04:00 Marek Olšák :
>
> A lot of GL3 and GL4 features actually only require GL2 hardware and
> r300 should support them.
>
> Marek
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Roma
A lot of GL3 and GL4 features actually only require GL2 hardware and
r300 should support them.
Marek
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Romain Failliot
wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> Little recap on my project. I don't know if've been there recently but there
> has been some nice changes (thanks for the llv
Hi guys!
Little recap on my project. I don't know if've been there recently but
there has been some nice changes (thanks for the llvmpipe and softpipe
cleanup by the way).
http://creak.foolstep.com/mesamatrix/
I'm wondering if something could be done for the r300 status. I think it
will definitel
Also I think some features that were added to soft/llvmpipe were
marked as swrast in GL3.txt.
Marek
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Yeah I guess so. I think we were lazy updating GL3.txt for these
> drivers, I'll whip up a patch.
>
> Roland
>
> Am 25.08.2014 16:41, s
Yeah I guess so. I think we were lazy updating GL3.txt for these
drivers, I'll whip up a patch.
Roland
Am 25.08.2014 16:41, schrieb Romain Failliot:
> Could it be possible to add these drivers in the lists instead of me
> adding some more exceptions in my code?
>
> (I ask that mainly because I m
Could it be possible to add these drivers in the lists instead of me adding
some more exceptions in my code?
(I ask that mainly because I might have bug reports saying that softpipe is
green but it's never mentioned in the original file)
2014-08-25 10:28 GMT-04:00 Roland Scheidegger :
>
> Am 25
On Mon Aug 25 2014 05:05:07 GMT+0100 (BST), Romain Failliot wrote:
> Some folks helped me and a lot of detection bug have been fixed!
>
> I have a question though (for my own culture): what's with the swrast, the
> softpipe and the llvmpipe? Aren't they all software drivers? What's the
> differe
Am 25.08.2014 07:56, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:05:07 AM Romain Failliot wrote:
>> Some folks helped me and a lot of detection bug have been fixed!
>>
>> I have a question though (for my own culture): what's with the swrast, the
>> softpipe and the llvmpipe? Aren't the
On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:05:07 AM Romain Failliot wrote:
> Some folks helped me and a lot of detection bug have been fixed!
>
> I have a question though (for my own culture): what's with the swrast, the
> softpipe and the llvmpipe? Aren't they all software drivers? What's the
> difference bet
Some folks helped me and a lot of detection bug have been fixed!
I have a question though (for my own culture): what's with the swrast, the
softpipe and the llvmpipe? Aren't they all software drivers? What's the
difference between all of them?
Thanks you!
2014-08-23 20:02 GMT-04:00 Marek Olšák
It's not correct. For example, transform feedback shouldn't be listed for r300.
Marek
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Romain Failliot
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made a PHP script to have a better representation of the OpenGL compliance
> of Mesa:
> http://creak.foolstep.com/mesamatrix/
>
> But I'm not
> Cool. You may also be interested in
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~imirkin/glxinfo/glxinfo.html which
> takes a more pragmatic approach of just using whatever is reported by
> glxinfo for various hardware for released mesa versions.
>
That is impressive!
> Seems reasonable. You're just talki
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Romain Failliot
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made a PHP script to have a better representation of the OpenGL compliance
> of Mesa:
> http://creak.foolstep.com/mesamatrix/
Cool. You may also be interested in
http://people.freedesktop.org/~imirkin/glxinfo/glxinfo.html which
t
Hi!
I made a PHP script to have a better representation of the OpenGL
compliance of Mesa:
http://creak.foolstep.com/mesamatrix/
But I'm not sure about the signification of some lines.
When there is a "DONE", with no parenthesis after, does it means it's done
for all the drivers?
And when there i
16 matches
Mail list logo
