Hi,
Just chipping in to leave a couple of additional notes.
As other have said before me, I also think the organization was very
good.
Things mentioned before:
* Tables layout: kind of agree it was not great for following the
talks but they were also making it easier to talk with other
a
Hi,
On 28 September 2017 at 03:49, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/27/2017 04:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> Sadly by the time we were aware of the dates for the khronos f2f it
>> was not possible to change the dates for XDC :-(
>>
>> The XDC dates were set in Feb, and afaict the khronos dates were
>> an
On 09/27/2017 10:07 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 09/27/2017 04:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 09/26/2017 09:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First again big thanks
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> If you had known of the khr dates, and brought it up in Feb (or really
>> somewhat earlier, given that XDC is roughly same time each year +/-
>> few weeks), that *might* have been early eno
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> If you had known of the khr dates, and brought it up in Feb (or really
> somewhat earlier, given that XDC is roughly same time each year +/-
> few weeks), that *might* have been early enough to move things.
That's unfair. It's part of the X.Org
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/27/2017 04:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2017 09:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Hi all,
First again big thanks to Stéphane and Jennifer for organizing a great X
On 09/27/2017 04:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 09/26/2017 09:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> First again big thanks to Stéphane and Jennifer for organizing a great XDC.
>>>
>>> Like last year we'd like to hear feedback on how t
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 09:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First again big thanks to Stéphane and Jennifer for organizing a great XDC.
>>
>> Like last year we'd like to hear feedback on how this year's XDC went,
>> both the good (and what y
It was a great time! Next year I should pay more attention that this was
happening so I don't sign up at the last moment causing me to miss a day,
and having a fever on the last day.
Looking forward to next year's!
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 09:57 AM, Da
On 09/26/2017 09:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First again big thanks to Stéphane and Jennifer for organizing a great XDC.
>
> Like last year we'd like to hear feedback on how this year's XDC went,
> both the good (and what you'd like to see more of) and the not so
> good. Talk select
Hi,
In general, I think the organization was great. I agree having
everything happen in a single room was a good point. Here's some of my
personal feedback:
* I didn't like the tables layout at all. I found it to be extremely
uncomfortable to have to look sideways in order to see the screens
Hi,
XDC was a really great conference and loved the fact that it was
in just one room which kept all the hallway conversations in that room resulting
into more networking.
But I agree with Andres that for the videos, it would be great to split the
huge youtube video stream per presentation and hav
Hi,
A small piece of feedback from those of us watching remotely. It would
be nice to have a simple to access index for the long livestream videos.
I think the XDC 2017 wiki page would be a good place for this
information. A brief example:
Presentation Title | Presenter Name | Link with tim
Hi all,
First again big thanks to Stéphane and Jennifer for organizing a great XDC.
Like last year we'd like to hear feedback on how this year's XDC went,
both the good (and what you'd like to see more of) and the not so
good. Talk selection, organization, location, scheduling of talks,
anything
14 matches
Mail list logo
