Re: [Mesa-dev] dead code

2016-08-03 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult > wrote: >> On 03.08.2016 13:25, Rob Clark wrote: >> >>> Probably it would be on a case-by-case basis. There are at least a >>> few places with some useful debug code, ie. not the

Re: [Mesa-dev] dead code

2016-08-03 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 03.08.2016 13:25, Rob Clark wrote: > >> Probably it would be on a case-by-case basis. There are at least a >> few places with some useful debug code, ie. not the kind that you'd >> normally enable, but stuff you'd want i

Re: [Mesa-dev] dead code

2016-08-03 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 03.08.2016 13:25, Rob Clark wrote: > Probably it would be on a case-by-case basis. There are at least a > few places with some useful debug code, ie. not the kind that you'd > normally enable, but stuff you'd want if you were making changes in > those areas.. In those cases, shouldn't we inst

Re: [Mesa-dev] dead code

2016-08-03 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Hi folks, > > > I've seen quite a lot of #if 0's - looks like dead code. > Should we remove that ? > Probably it would be on a case-by-case basis. There are at least a few places with some useful debug code, ie. not the ki

[Mesa-dev] dead code

2016-08-03 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Hi folks, I've seen quite a lot of #if 0's - looks like dead code. Should we remove that ? --mtx ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev