Hi,
Sorry for the top-post but the Gmail mobile app no longer believes in
inline quoting.
As for installing newer Meson, that's not strictly needed. As you say,
Meson deliberately doesn't have difficult or changing dependencies. It can
also be run straight from a checkout without mangling $PATH or
Quoting Tapani Pälli (2017-09-27 23:34:26)
>
>
> On 09/27/2017 08:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >> Dylan Baker writes:
> >>
> >>> [ Unknown signature status ]
> >>> I've gone ahead and pushed the Vulkan drivers meson builds.
> >>>
> >>> For
On 09/27/2017 08:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Dylan Baker writes:
[ Unknown signature status ]
I've gone ahead and pushed the Vulkan drivers meson builds.
For those interested in helping finish the conversion, I have a branch
"wip/meson-4"
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Dylan Baker writes:
>
>> [ Unknown signature status ]
>> I've gone ahead and pushed the Vulkan drivers meson builds.
>>
>> For those interested in helping finish the conversion, I have a branch
>> "wip/meson-4" on my github (github.com/dcbake
Dylan Baker writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> I've gone ahead and pushed the Vulkan drivers meson builds.
>
> For those interested in helping finish the conversion, I have a branch
> "wip/meson-4" on my github (github.com/dcbaker/mesa) that has i965 and most of
> the core classic mesa stac
I've gone ahead and pushed the Vulkan drivers meson builds.
For those interested in helping finish the conversion, I have a branch
"wip/meson-4" on my github (github.com/dcbaker/mesa) that has i965 and most of
the core classic mesa stack building. I'm working on GLX, then EGL to start
testing this
On 21/09/17 01:20, Eric Anholt wrote:
Dylan Baker writes:
Results
autotools : sh -c 535.34s user 30.33s system 310% cpu 3:02.05 total
meson : sh -c 136.58s user 11.98s system 372% cpu 39.895 total
I just want to point at these numbers again. meson is so transformative
for your normal
Matt Turner writes:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Dylan Baker writes:
Results
autotools : sh -c 535.34s user 30.33s system 310% cpu 3:02.05 total
meson : sh -c 136.58s user 11.98s
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Dylan Baker writes:
>>> Results
>>> autotools : sh -c 535.34s user 30.33s system 310% cpu 3:02.05 total
>>> meson : sh -c 136.58s user 11.98s system 372% cpu 39.895 total
>>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> Wasn't lacking distcheck support one of the arguments against moving
> to only a scons build when this was brought up all those years ago?
> Does Meson provide something similar, or do people just now get all
> of the source from git nowa
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Dylan Baker writes:
>> Results
>> autotools : sh -c 535.34s user 30.33s system 310% cpu 3:02.05 total
>> meson : sh -c 136.58s user 11.98s system 372% cpu 39.895 total
>
> I just want to point at these numbers again. meson is so trans
Dylan Baker writes:
> Results
> autotools : sh -c 535.34s user 30.33s system 310% cpu 3:02.05 total
> meson : sh -c 136.58s user 11.98s system 372% cpu 39.895 total
I just want to point at these numbers again. meson is so transformative
for your normal build/test cycles that it's worth i
Hi everyone,
A long time ago I made some rumbling about porting mesa to meson (isn't that
confusing). In the mean time I've been bogged down with other projects,
including adding features to meson itself, and trying to write and rebase meson
patches for all of mesa. Unfortunately mesa is a large f
13 matches
Mail list logo
