On 10 November 2015 at 06:36, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 01:15 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On 10 November 2015 at 00:30, Roland Scheidegger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 09.11.2015 um 04:44 schrieb Dave Airlie:
So it appears my patch to enable front buffer access on soft/llvmpipe
ca
On 11/09/2015 01:15 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 10 November 2015 at 00:30, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 09.11.2015 um 04:44 schrieb Dave Airlie:
So it appears my patch to enable front buffer access on soft/llvmpipe
causes some piglit regressions. However these are due to piglit having
undefined
On 10 November 2015 at 00:30, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 09.11.2015 um 04:44 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>> So it appears my patch to enable front buffer access on soft/llvmpipe
>> causes some piglit regressions. However these are due to piglit having
>> undefined behaviour where it doesn't create a
Am 09.11.2015 um 04:44 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> So it appears my patch to enable front buffer access on soft/llvmpipe
> causes some piglit regressions. However these are due to piglit having
> undefined behaviour where it doesn't create a window but has tests
> requiring a front buffer. The new code
So it appears my patch to enable front buffer access on soft/llvmpipe
causes some piglit regressions. However these are due to piglit having
undefined behaviour where it doesn't create a window but has tests
requiring a front buffer. The new code does an XGetImage on the front
buffer and when it fa