On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Stéphane Marchesin
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jose Fonseca
>> > wrote:
> [...]
>> >> I can't reproduce the failures here neither, nor with softpipe +
>>
- Original Message -
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Stéphane Marchesin
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jose Fonseca
> > wrote:
[...]
> >> I can't reproduce the failures here neither, nor with softpipe +
> >> draw llvm
> >>
> >> I also considered that this could be 32bit
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Stéphane Marchesin
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> Am 18.07.2012 07:11, schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Roland Scheidegger
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Am 17.07.2012 23:49,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Am 18.07.2012 07:11, schrieb Marek Olšák:
>> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Roland Scheidegger
>> > wrote:
>> >> Am 17.07.2012 23:49, schrieb Stéphane Marchesin:
>> >>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM,
- Original Message -
> Am 18.07.2012 07:11, schrieb Marek Olšák:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Roland Scheidegger
> > wrote:
> >> Am 17.07.2012 23:49, schrieb Stéphane Marchesin:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jose Fonseca
> >>> wrote:
> FYI, I've just pushed a bran
Am 18.07.2012 07:11, schrieb Marek Olšák:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Roland Scheidegger
> wrote:
>> Am 17.07.2012 23:49, schrieb Stéphane Marchesin:
>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which allows
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 17.07.2012 23:49, schrieb Stéphane Marchesin:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>> FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which allows
>>> llvmpipe to leverage SIMD registers wider than 128
Am 17.07.2012 23:49, schrieb Stéphane Marchesin:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which allows
>> llvmpipe to leverage SIMD registers wider than 128bits.
>>
>> Unfortunately, performance-wise this doesn't change m
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which allows
> llvmpipe to leverage SIMD registers wider than 128bits.
>
> Unfortunately, performance-wise this doesn't change much, as llvmpipe
> performance is dominated by integer
Am 17.07.2012 16:02, schrieb Tom Stellard:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:26:49AM -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:57:37AM -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>> - Original Message -
FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which
allows llvmpipe
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:26:49AM -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:57:37AM -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which
> > > allows llvmpipe to leverage SIMD registers wider than 128bi
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:57:37AM -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which
> > allows llvmpipe to leverage SIMD registers wider than 128bits.
> >
> > Unfortunately, performance-wise this doesn't change much, as l
- Original Message -
> FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which
> allows llvmpipe to leverage SIMD registers wider than 128bits.
>
> Unfortunately, performance-wise this doesn't change much, as llvmpipe
> performance is dominated by integer SIMD instructions, whereas
FYI, I've just pushed a branch named llvmpipe-wider-regs, which allows llvmpipe
to leverage SIMD registers wider than 128bits.
Unfortunately, performance-wise this doesn't change much, as llvmpipe
performance is dominated by integer SIMD instructions, whereas currently the
AVX instruction set c
14 matches
Mail list logo