So... I don't think we're going to figure this out here. At least I
have nothing enlightening to say. FWIW this is doing the same thing as
what i965 does wrt the persample_shading computation. It should be
pretty easy to change should we decide on a different interpretation
of the spec.
The only
Alright. For the patch:
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák marek.ol...@amd.com
Marek
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
So... I don't think we're going to figure this out here. At least I
have nothing enlightening to say. FWIW this is doing the same thing as
what
Looks good to me. It is unfortunate I guess that shaders may need
recompilation just because the inputs are interpolated differently but I
don't see a easy way out there.
Roland
Am 05.07.2014 06:07, schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
This enables a gallium driver not to care about the semantics of
There is this vague statement in the sample shading spec:
When the sample shading fraction is 1.0, a separate set of colors and
other associated data are evaluated for each sample, each set of values
are evaluated at the sample location.
I thought it was about interpolation, meaning
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
There is this vague statement in the sample shading spec:
When the sample shading fraction is 1.0, a separate set of colors and
other associated data are evaluated for each sample, each set of values
are evaluated
What you say makes sense. I'm just asking what that sentence in the
spec means if it isn't about interpolation. :)
Marek
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
There is this vague statement in
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
There is this vague statement in the sample shading spec:
When the sample shading fraction is 1.0, a separate set of colors and
other associated data are evaluated for each sample, each set of values
are evaluated
