On Thursday 05 June 2008 12:47:07 am Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Gallium might ultimately wind up in its own repository as a stand-alone
> > project. Afterall, Gallium drivers could be used by APIs other than
> > OpenGL.
>
> The question is mainly from a distro point of view what do we need to ship
> a
>
> Gallium might ultimately wind up in its own repository as a stand-alone
> project. Afterall, Gallium drivers could be used by APIs other than OpenGL.
The question is mainly from a distro point of view what do we need to ship
a gallium driver. The current method would mean we need a Mesa t
Dave Airlie wrote:
> Stephane wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> It seems like people are mostly concerned about gallium stability
>> right now. How stable wioll the interfaces be in the future ? Maybe if
>> you could tell us, that'd help others jump in.
The gallium interfaces won't change radically, but
Rather than just defining HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN on Linux, check whether
the function exists on all platforms and define the macro if it is.
---
Dan
This seems like the right thing to do, but I only have Linux to test
on. Any BSDers know if this is alright? As I understand it,
posix_memalign is av
