http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24320
Brian Paul brian.e.p...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24320
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Tsyvarev tsyva...@ispras.ru 2009-10-07 02:48:00
PST ---
GLX version, shown by glxinfo, is 1.4.
X server is Xvfb, native for Ubuntu 8.10. Normally, it corresponds with Mesa
6.2(GLX version 1.2), but when runnning
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24320
--- Comment #3 from Corbin Simpson mostawesomed...@gmail.com 2009-10-07
05:41:01 PST ---
Ian and I discussed this last week. We were not reporting GLX 1.4 until very
recently (the patch just came in a few days ago) so I'm a bit skeptical
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24320
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Tsyvarev tsyva...@ispras.ru 2009-10-07 07:46:47
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=30141)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=30141)
glxinfo output
GLX 1.4 on the server is only when LD_LIBRARY_PATH
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24320
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Tsyvarev tsyva...@ispras.ru 2009-10-07 07:49:47
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=30142)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=30142)
glxinfo output without additional environment variables
Real
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24320
--- Comment #6 from Brian Paul brian.e.p...@gmail.com 2009-10-07 08:44:55
PST ---
OK, there's a few bugs in the fake GLX code here. I've committed fixes to the
Mesa 7.6 branch.
For the real GLX case (the second glxinfo) you've only got GLX
