On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 19:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:04 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:15 +0200
> > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
> >
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:04 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:15 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
> > > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:15 +0200
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
> > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Flo
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:18:04PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
[...]
> i could manage it somewhat... one problem i had, was that after a
> while the screen-saver would disable my displays and then glxgears
> wouldnt hang anymore... (where to disable that?)
[...]
Some combination of:
xset -dpms
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:02 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:40:27 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
> > > > Ma
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
Stephan Raue wrote:
> looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
> Subject "Problem using an Mesa based App with recent
> xorg/mesa/xf86-video-intel (loop?)" to Mesa-dev, xorg and intel-gfx list?
>
> i have still this issue, but i don
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:11:59 -0800
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> It would help to know what the server is doing at this point with the
> client. It may be that it put the client to sleep and hasn't woken it
> up yet, or there could be something wrong with our getbuffers code in
> the new scheme.
>
> Jes
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
> > > Stephan Raue wrote:
> > >
> > > > looks this like my problems that i h
Hi Jesse,
Am 07.03.2010 00:11, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> It would help to know what the server is doing at this point with the
> client. It may be that it put the client to sleep and hasn't woken it
> up yet, or there could be something wrong with our getbuffers code in
> the new scheme.
>
>
do
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
> > > >
It would help to know what the server is doing at this point with the
client. It may be that it put the client to sleep and hasn't woken it
up yet, or there could be something wrong with our getbuffers code in
the new scheme.
Jesse
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
Stephan Raue wrote:
> looks
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
> > Stephan Raue wrote:
> >
> > > looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
> > > Subject "Problem using an Mesa b
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
> Stephan Raue wrote:
>
> > looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
> > Subject "Problem using an Mesa based App with recent
> > xorg/mesa/xf86-video-intel (loop?)" to Mesa
looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
Subject "Problem using an Mesa based App with recent
xorg/mesa/xf86-video-intel (loop?)" to Mesa-dev, xorg and intel-gfx list?
i have still this issue, but i dont know what you need for informations
to fix the issues?
with ati
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:02 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:40:27 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
> > > > Ma
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:40:27 +0200
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
> > > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
> > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
> > >
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
> > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42:21 +0200
> > > >
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
> > > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -080
19 matches
Mail list logo