ugh, i feel foolish for having overlooked the radeon-rewrite.
it's a commendable effort on David Airlie's part and my time would be
much better spent trying to contribute toward the finalization of that
code, to the best of my abilities.
thank you for the guidance.
martin
---
On 29.04.2009 16:12, martin krastev wrote:
> Thank you, Roland, that explains it all. When i said the code was
> running that much faster on almost the same configuration - that other
> config is AGPx4, with a native OSX driver edge for the rv280 (it's a
> mac). And yes, the vertex arrays are large
Thank you, Roland, that explains it all. When i said the code was
running that much faster on almost the same configuration - that other
config is AGPx4, with a native OSX driver edge for the rv280 (it's a
mac). And yes, the vertex arrays are large. So in one case we have
larger vertex arrays perpe
On 28.04.2009 19:46, martin krastev wrote:
> Thank you, Roland, for the prompt reply.
>
> 'R200_DEBUG=fall' did not reveal any sw fallbacks, so my inital
> assumption of a potential TCL such occuring appears to be wrong. On
> the other hand, 'R200_DEBUG=all' showed something interesting.
> 'R200_
Thank you, Roland, for the prompt reply.
'R200_DEBUG=fall' did not reveal any sw fallbacks, so my inital
assumption of a potential TCL such occuring appears to be wrong. On
the other hand, 'R200_DEBUG=all' showed something interesting.
For a sequence of identical STATIC_DRAW-kind VBO-carried draw
On 26.04.2009 17:59, martin krastev wrote:
> hello.
>
> I have been experiencing difficulties trying to get fixed-pipeline TCL
> and ARBVP1 hardware support for an ATI 9250 PCI board (chip id 0x5960)
> under Xorg 1.5.3 and FOSS ATI DRI edge 6.10, running on a ppc station.
> Is there such a know is
hello.
I have been experiencing difficulties trying to get fixed-pipeline TCL
and ARBVP1 hardware support for an ATI 9250 PCI board (chip id 0x5960)
under Xorg 1.5.3 and FOSS ATI DRI edge 6.10, running on a ppc station.
Is there such a know issue or does my problem present an isolated
case?
for t
