[PATCH] nntp: cleanup: move use statements out of sub scope

This clarifies the code somewhat, and we don't care to lazy-load in NNTP.pm anyways since this is only used for a long-lived daemon. --- lib/PublicInbox/NNTP.pm | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/PublicInbox/NNTP.pm b/lib/PublicInbox/NNTP.pm index

Re: Announcing Git User's Survey 2016 [was: Working with public-inbox.org]

Hello Johannes, W dniu 09.09.2016 o 15:06, Johannes Schindelin napisał: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote: >> W dniu 28.08.2016 o 10:38, Johannes Schindelin pisze: >> >>> I would like to strongly caution against putting too much stock into >>> this users' survey. It is the best we have,

Re: Announcing Git User's Survey 2016 [was: Working with public-inbox.org]

Hi Kuba, On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote: > W dniu 28.08.2016 o 10:38, Johannes Schindelin pisze: > > > I would like to strongly caution against putting too much stock into > > this users' survey. It is the best we have, granted. Yet I have not > > heard from anybody that they

[PATCH] TODO: updates for done items

The existing string -> number date range Xapian query is good enough, and having too much flexibility is probably bad for caching (as well as increasing our attack surface, because parsing queries is tricky). Tags-as-skiplists are probably not worth the effort given Xapian, and we may have to