Re: Announcing Git User's Survey 2016 [was: Working with public-inbox.org]

2016-09-09 Thread Jakub Narębski
Hello Johannes, W dniu 09.09.2016 o 15:06, Johannes Schindelin napisał: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote: >> W dniu 28.08.2016 o 10:38, Johannes Schindelin pisze: >> >>> I would like to strongly caution against putting too much stock into >>> this user

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-28 Thread Jakub Narębski
Hello Johannes, W dniu 25.08.2016 o 15:21, Johannes Schindelin pisze: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote: >> W dniu 22.08.2016 o 15:18, Johannes Schindelin pisze: >> >>> So unfortunately this thread has devolved. Which is sad. Because all I >>> wa

Announcing Git User's Survey 2016 [was: Working with public-inbox.org]

2016-08-28 Thread Jakub Narębski
Hello Johannes, W dniu 28.08.2016 o 10:38, Johannes Schindelin pisze: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote: >> W dniu 22.08.2016 o 15:15, Duy Nguyen pisze: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Johannes Schindelin >>> wrote: >>>> >>>

Re: Working with public-inbox.org

2016-08-28 Thread Jakub Narębski
Hello Johannes, W dniu 28.08.2016 o 10:36, Johannes Schindelin pisze: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote: >> W dniu 25.08.2016 o 14:58, Johannes Schindelin pisze: >>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Eric Wong wrote: >>>> Johannes Schindelin wrote: >>>> &g

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-27 Thread Jakub Narębski
ven feature parity with centralized tools (c.f. FSF). Though Git is not there to improve the world, just to be better... On the other hand some may say that centralized tools (such as GitHub and its pull requests) do not achieve feature parity with email based workflow... though the basics are here. Best regards, -- Jakub Narębski

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-27 Thread Jakub Narębski
/ae804c55-d145-fc90-e1a9-6ebd6c604...@gmail.com/T/#u '[RFCv2] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016", take two' Message-ID: <91a2ffbe-a73b-fbb9-96da-9aea4d439...@gmail.com> -- Jakub Narębski

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-22 Thread Jakub Narębski
l. do not have such submitGit-like automation built-in). But I think email, with threaded view, careful trimming of quoted contents, multi-level quotes is superior to exiting web-based solutions. Regards, -- Jakub Narębski

Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

2016-08-20 Thread Jakub Narębski
ling for >that, but it's something that could be made generally available, as >it's unrelated to the MUA. It's also not necessarily specific to >mailing list development (e.g., a push-based workflow that >aggressively rebases runs into the same versioning questions). Well, "What's cooking ..." and 'pu' branch helps, I think. -- Jakub Narębski