We did not have a test for this, and need to guard against
regressions when changing Xapcmd to use File::Temp->newdir
in future commits.
---
 t/xcpdb-reshard.t | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/t/xcpdb-reshard.t b/t/xcpdb-reshard.t
index 88e6c3dc..9335843d 100644
--- a/t/xcpdb-reshard.t
+++ b/t/xcpdb-reshard.t
@@ -50,7 +50,9 @@ my %nums = map {; "$_->{num}" => 1 } @$orig;
 # ensure we can go up or down in shards, or stay the same:
 for my $R (qw(2 4 1 3 3)) {
        delete $ibx->{search}; # release old handles
-       ok(run_script([@xcpdb, "-R$R", $ibx->{inboxdir}]), "xcpdb -R$R");
+       my $cmd = [@xcpdb, "-R$R", $ibx->{inboxdir}];
+       push @$cmd, '--compact' if $R == 1;
+       ok(run_script($cmd), "xcpdb -R$R");
        my @new_shards = grep(m!/\d+\z!, glob("$ibx->{inboxdir}/xap*/*"));
        is(scalar(@new_shards), $R, 'resharded to two shards');
        my $msgs = $ibx->search->query('s:this');
--
unsubscribe: meta+unsubscr...@public-inbox.org
archive: https://public-inbox.org/meta/

Reply via email to