Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:33:14AM GMT, Eric Wong wrote:
> > https://public-inbox.org/meta/20240508110957.3108196-...@80x24.org/
> > Yeah, though there's 3 ways of indexing strings, currently :x
> > I've decided to keep some options open and support boolean_term,
>
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:33:14AM GMT, Eric Wong wrote:
> > I'm whole-heartedly for this! This ties nicely to my b4 work where I'd
> > like to be able to identify code-review trailers sent for a specific
> > patch, even if that patch itself is not on lore. For example, this could
> > be a
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 07:19:21AM GMT, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Correct, public-inbox currently won't index every header due to
> > cost, false positives, and otherwise lack of usefulness (general
> > gibberish from DKIM sigs, various UUIDs, etc).
> >
> > So it doesn't
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 07:19:21AM GMT, Eric Wong wrote:
> Correct, public-inbox currently won't index every header due to
> cost, false positives, and otherwise lack of usefulness (general
> gibberish from DKIM sigs, various UUIDs, etc).
>
> So it doesn't currently know about "X-stable:"
>
> I
"Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Greg and Sasha add the "X-stable: review" to their patch bombs, with the
> intention that people will be able to filter these out should they
> desire to do so. For example, I usually want all threads that match code
> I care about, but I don't regularly
Hi,
Greg and Sasha add the "X-stable: review" to their patch bombs, with the
intention that people will be able to filter these out should they
desire to do so. For example, I usually want all threads that match code
I care about, but I don't regularly want to see thousand-patch stable
series. So
