Re: [meta-freescale] Regarding GStreamer-1.x status on iMX6Q

2013-11-18 Thread Joshua Kurland
That's great news! At this point in time decoding is the only thing important to me. Have you pushed the stable version of the decoder to the gstreamer-imx repo? Thanks, Josh Kurland On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: > On 2013-11-18 17:07, Otavio Salvador wrote: >

Re: [meta-freescale] Regarding GStreamer-1.x status on iMX6Q

2013-11-18 Thread Carlos Rafael Giani
On 2013-11-18 17:07, Otavio Salvador wrote: (adding Carlos in Cc) On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Joshua Kurland wrote: Can anyone give a status update on the stability/functionality of gstreamer-1.x plugin on the imx6Q? The readme page has listed it in alpha for a while. For the applicatio

Re: [meta-freescale] Regarding GStreamer-1.x status on iMX6Q

2013-11-18 Thread Otavio Salvador
(adding Carlos in Cc) On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Joshua Kurland wrote: > Can anyone give a status update on the stability/functionality of > gstreamer-1.x plugin on the imx6Q? The readme page has listed it in > alpha for a while. > > For the application that I am working on, it would be mo

Re: [meta-freescale] dora : to much in advance vs oe-core ?

2013-11-18 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi Otavio, > > I see you have applied in dora : > a698f33 linux-imx.inc: Remove imx-test specific hack > 539ea10 linux-imx.inc: Drop extra sysroot staging > > this patch depends on the following commit in oe-core : > commit 5bcd65807aa634060f9

[meta-freescale] Regarding GStreamer-1.x status on iMX6Q

2013-11-18 Thread Joshua Kurland
Hi, Can anyone give a status update on the stability/functionality of gstreamer-1.x plugin on the imx6Q? The readme page has listed it in alpha for a while. For the application that I am working on, it would be more beneficial to use 1.x. If their is still work to be done with porting it over,

[meta-freescale] P4080 IP routing performance regression

2013-11-18 Thread Björn Stenberg
Hi all. We have found a performance regression in the linux-qoriq kernel released for dora. IP routing performance for small packets has decreased by over 20% between kernels 3.0.51 (dylan) and 3.8.13 (dora). The test uses two 10 Gbit interfaces on a p4080ds board. We feed UDP packets at full

[meta-freescale] dora : to much in advance vs oe-core ?

2013-11-18 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi Otavio, I see you have applied in dora : a698f33 linux-imx.inc: Remove imx-test specific hack 539ea10 linux-imx.inc: Drop extra sysroot staging this patch depends on the following commit in oe-core : commit 5bcd65807aa634060f98928db6011856934dabe4 Author: Bruce Ashfield Date: Tue Oct 8 17:1

[meta-freescale] fsl-image-gui - root login prompt is not comming

2013-11-18 Thread Krishna
Hi, I am trying to boot fsl-image-gui on i.Mx 6 SabreSd board. But it is hanging after splash screen is completed and black screen is displayed on LCD. and this is the last print displayed on console: Running local boot scripts Stopping Bootlog daemon: bootlogd. Any script I need to change t

Re: [meta-freescale] R: R: Building qtbase for imx6qsabresd

2013-11-18 Thread Marco
Il 18/11/2013 11:40, Simone ha scritto: Hello Marco, sorry for the attachment.. I've tried both bitbake qtbase only and a new recipe inherited from fsl-image-gui (with qtbase added to IMAGE_INSTALL). In both cases the result is the same. For other meta-layer, bitbake say that they are nobranch:

[meta-freescale] R: R: Building qtbase for imx6qsabresd

2013-11-18 Thread Simone
Hello Marco, sorry for the attachment.. I've tried both bitbake qtbase only and a new recipe inherited from fsl-image-gui (with qtbase added to IMAGE_INSTALL). In both cases the result is the same. For other meta-layer, bitbake say that they are nobranch:

Re: [meta-freescale] Error 0x300b in Qt5 applications with EGLFS

2013-11-18 Thread Alfonso Tamés
On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:58 AM, Alfonso Tamés wrote: > > Has anyone managed to get Qt5 running without X11? > yes just before dora was released. Thas was with oe-core + meta-oe + meta-fsl-arm and x11 removed from the DISTRO FLAGS and opengl added to DISTRO FLAGS.

Re: [meta-freescale] Error 0x300b in Qt5 applications with EGLFS

2013-11-18 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi, Le Mon, 18 Nov 2013 03:14:15 -0600, Alfonso Tamés a écrit : > >> > >> Has anyone managed to get Qt5 running without X11? > >> > > yes just before dora was released. > > Thas was with oe-core + meta-oe + meta-fsl-arm and x11 removed from the > > DISTRO FLAGS and opengl added to DISTRO FLAGS

Re: [meta-freescale] R: Building qtbase for imx6qsabresd

2013-11-18 Thread Marco
Il 18/11/2013 09:40, Simone ha scritto: Attached I send the compile log at my side. Thanks to all Regards Simone Simone, a pastebin would be a better solution rather than large attachements ;-) Which branches are you using for each metalayer ? Are you bitbaking qtbase only or do you have any

Re: [meta-freescale] Error 0x300b in Qt5 applications with EGLFS

2013-11-18 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi, Le Sun, 17 Nov 2013 13:53:52 -0600, Alfonso Tamés a écrit : > > Using a wand board quad with the LCD display from Future Electronics, I am > building qt5 using the master branch by cloning meta-qt5 in the sources > directory, adding the directory in conf/bblayers.conf and adding this in t