Good afternoon,
I have a freescale LS1021A-IOT development board and was wondering if
the meta-fsl-arm layer was the correct board support package for it? I
can see the ls1021atwr.conf in meta-fsl-arm/conf/machine/ which targets
the ls102xa chipset so it seems likely to be the correct one.
Wha
On 07/13/2016 06:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Ting Liu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:39 PM
To: Ting Liu
Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-f
I am using the SCMIMX6 Quick Start board. I am trying to switch out default
3.14.52 kernel for the 3.14.28_rt kernel. So far I have modified the following:
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel_mx6 = "linux-imx-rt"
PREFFERED_VERSION_linux-imx_mx6 = "3.14.28"
When I compile the kernel with bitba
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:53 AM, jags gediya wrote:
> I am building external kernel source for imx7 board.
>
> I have done below changes for it, it is working fine while build.
>
> inherit externalsrc
> EXTERNALSRC = /path/to/kernel/
> EXTERNALSRC_BUILD = /path/to/kernel
>
> but when i do clean th
I am building external kernel source for imx7 board.
I have done below changes for it, it is working fine while build.
inherit
externalsrc
EXTERNALSRC = /path/to/kernel/
EXTERNALSRC_BUILD = /path/to/kernel
but when i do clean through bitbake, clean is not happening in externalsrc
pointed direct
Dear All,
Seeing the below wayland log without above workaround focus is going 0
to surface. I think it means surface is failing to grab the touch
focus. What could be the reasons of focus not getting setup?
I think this [3687363.407] ivi_input@19.input_focus(90, 4, 0) need to
be [3687363.407] iv
> -Original Message-
> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:49 PM
> To: Ting Liu
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 05/67] qoriq-
> arm64.inc: add
>
> On Mon, Jul 4
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Ting Liu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:39 PM
>> To: Ting Liu
>> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer]
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Ting Liu wrote:
>> - please don't include soc-family.inc and instead use MACHINEOVERRIDES (I
>> am preparing same change for i.MX)
>
> [Liu Ting-B28495] why? could you please elaborate? I did not see any
> discussion on the Maillist. Do I miss something?
We are
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Ting Liu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:49 PM
>> To: Ting Liu
>> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer]
> -Original Message-
> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:39 PM
> To: Ting Liu
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 01/67] remove
> not supported e500v2 machines
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:46 PM
> To: Ting Liu
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 04/67]
> conf/machine: sync with meta-fsl-ppc
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
