ste...@gmail.com>; meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] ANN: New layout for FSL Community BSP and BSP
layers
Importance: Low
> Speaking in renaming: why don't we use NXP instead of FSL?
Perhaps after yesterday's announcement you should delay the rename a few months
Hello Otavio
Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 08:14 -0200 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> Hello Max,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Max Krummenacher <
> max.oss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > 2016-10-26 14:15 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador <
> > otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br>:
> > > On
> Speaking in renaming: why don't we use NXP instead of FSL?
Perhaps after yesterday's announcement you should delay the rename a few months
and use Qualcomm instead of NXP? Or perhaps plan to move directly from FSL to
Qualcomm in a couple of years depending how it all pans out.
--
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Maciej Borzęcki
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> wrote:
>>> We are now
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
>> Hello Max,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Max Krummenacher
>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> Hello Max,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Max Krummenacher
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> 2016-10-26 14:15 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador
>> :
>>> On
Hello Max,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> 2016-10-26 14:15 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador :
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:16 AM,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Daiane Angolini
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> In 2015 an
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> In 2015 an effort to unify the i.MX and QorIQ BSP layers has been
>> started and today we are
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In 2015 an effort to unify the i.MX and QorIQ BSP layers has been
> started and today we are finally moving the FSL Community BSP to use
> the result of this work.
I think this is a
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Maciej Borzęcki
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
>> We are now focusing in verifying as much the build results as possible
>> from the new FSL Community BSP and to
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2016-10-25 16:52, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> So, in practice, should we start using these new layers immediately?
If you have products using krogoth or older releases, nothing changes.
For master and upcoming morty,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In 2015 an effort to unify the i.MX and QorIQ BSP layers has been
> started and today we are finally moving the FSL Community BSP to use
> the result of this work.
>
> The development
On 2016-10-25 16:52, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello everyone,
In 2015 an effort to unify the i.MX and QorIQ BSP layers has been
started and today we are finally moving the FSL Community BSP to use
the result of this work.
The development of this new layer has been possible due a
collaborative
Hello everyone,
In 2015 an effort to unify the i.MX and QorIQ BSP layers has been
started and today we are finally moving the FSL Community BSP to use
the result of this work.
The development of this new layer has been possible due a
collaborative work from O.S. Systems and NXP. It has been a
15 matches
Mail list logo