Hello Saul!
I noticed that you changed meta-intel.inc from extending INITRD to
INITRD_LIVE:
meta-intel rev: cdbf029110327a51c0
This address a boot issue based on using the new bootimg code that
makes a distiction between Live and VM type of image so they can
co-exisit.
# for the ea
The qat recipe currently relies on EXTRA_OEMAKE having been set to
"-e MAKEFLAGS=" in bitbake.conf to operate. It is necessary to make this
explicit so that the default in bitbake.conf can be changed.
The prototype of a func used in QAT16 is changed in kernel v4.4
Also, make sure that we point t
Dear Maintainer(s),
These changes fix the build errors with qat16 v2.5.0-80, openssl-qat v0.4.9-009
and zlib-qat v0.4.7-002 against kernel 4.1.x and 4.4.x.
These recipes currently rely on EXTRA_OEMAKE having been set to
"-e MAKEFLAGS=" in bitbake.conf to operate. It is necessary to make this
ex
The openssl recipe currently relies on EXTRA_OEMAKE having been set to
"-e MAKEFLAGS=" in bitbake.conf to operate. It is necessary to make this
explicit so that the default in bitbake.conf can be changed.
Signed-off-by: Rahul Kumar Gupta
---
meta-isg/common/recipes-extended/zlib-qat/zlib-qat_0.4
'disable-static' option is there in EXTRA_OECONF variable. No such option
is supported by configure script. So better to pass required option
directly without using variable.
This recipe currently relies on EXTRA_OEMAKE having been set to
"-e MAKEFLAGS=" in bitbake.conf to operate. It is necessary
It is expected that every layer provides a priority and its
BBFILE_PATTERN. This includes the needed information in
layer.conf.
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola
---
meta-tlk/conf/layer.conf | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta-tlk/conf/layer.conf b/meta-tlk/conf
Dear Sirs,
We’re facing issue on installing Yocto on Samsung eMMC. The eMMC model is as
below. However, we tried to install on Micron eMMC and it’s no problem. We’re
just wondering if Yocto needs to use with specific eMMC brand/model?
KLMAG2GEND-B031
Thank you so much.
Yours sincerely,
Max C
On 03/30/2016 04:45 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Hello Saul!
I noticed that you changed meta-intel.inc from extending INITRD to
INITRD_LIVE:
meta-intel rev: cdbf029110327a51c0
This address a boot issue based on using the new bootimg code that
makes a distiction between Live and VM type
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 17:12 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>
> On 03/30/2016 04:45 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > Hello Saul!
> >
> > I noticed that you changed meta-intel.inc from extending INITRD to
> > INITRD_LIVE:
> >
> > meta-intel rev: cdbf029110327a51c0
> >
> > This address a boot issue based
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 10:31 -0700, Stephano Cetola wrote:
> It is expected that every layer provides a priority and its
> BBFILE_PATTERN. This includes the needed information in
> layer.conf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola
> ---
> meta-tlk/conf/layer.conf | 4
> 1 file chang
On 03/31/2016 02:39 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 17:12 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/30/2016 04:45 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Hello Saul!
I noticed that you changed meta-intel.inc from extending INITRD to
INITRD_LIVE:
meta-intel rev: cdbf029110327a51c0
This address a
On 03/31/2016 09:19 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/31/2016 02:39 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 17:12 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/30/2016 04:45 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Hello Saul!
I noticed that you changed meta-intel.inc from extending INITRD to
INITRD_LIVE:
meta-intel
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 09:19 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>
> On 03/31/2016 02:39 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 17:12 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03/30/2016 04:45 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> >>> Hello Saul!
> >>>
> >>> I noticed that you changed meta-intel.inc from extendi
On 03/31/2016 01:18 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 09:19 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/31/2016 02:39 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 17:12 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
On 03/30/2016 04:45 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Hello Saul!
I noticed that you changed meta-inte
14 matches
Mail list logo
