Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv5 0/1] Runtime Machine Configuration (RMC)

2016-08-02 Thread Tom Zanussi
Hi Jianxun, On 08/02/2016 08:59 PM, Jianxun Zhang wrote: > Hi Saul, Tom & others, > > This is the V5 submission of RMC work which squashed top commit of V4.5, also > with some minor adjustments in rmc README file and commit messages. > >

[meta-intel] [PATCHv5 0/1] Runtime Machine Configuration (RMC)

2016-08-02 Thread Jianxun Zhang
Hi Saul, Tom & others, This is the V5 submission of RMC work which squashed top commit of V4.5, also with some minor adjustments in rmc README file and commit messages. http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel-contrib/log/?h=jxzhang/rmc-submission-V5

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv4.5 0/1] Runtime Machine Configuration (RMC)

2016-08-02 Thread Saul Wold
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 15:35 -0700, Jianxun Zhang wrote: > Sorry, I forgot to update README for the tip and branch name is a > little confusing. I resend 4.5 as this: > > There are fixes, new functionalities for stage 2 and workaround over > V4: >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv4.5 0/1] Runtime Machine Configuration (RMC)

2016-08-02 Thread Jianxun Zhang
Sorry, I forgot to update README for the tip and branch name is a little confusing. I resend 4.5 as this: There are fixes, new functionalities for stage 2 and workaround over V4: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel-contrib/log/?h=jxzhang/rmc-submission-V4.5 Please refer to

[meta-intel] [PATCHv4.5 0/1] Runtime Machine Configuration (RMC)

2016-08-02 Thread Jianxun Zhang
Tom, Saul and others, I don’t call this RMC patch series V5 because I am not sure if we are okay to roll these into main submission, also assuming it could be easier for reviewers to get real deltas from V4.