From: sweeaun
Upgrade xf86-video-mga version to 1.6.5. Adapt block/wakeupHandler
signature for ABI 23 patch has been removed as the change already
available from Upstream 1.6.5.
Signed-off-by: sweeaun
---
...-Block-WakeupHandler-signature-for-ABI-23.patch | 36 --
...-video
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../libyami-utils/0001-Fix-build-with-clang.patch | 99 ++
.../libyami/libyami-utils_1.2.0.bb | 4 +-
2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644
common/recipes-multimedia/libyami/libyami-utils/0001-Fix-b
Clang detects more warnings as errors and these fixes address it
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../dpdk-dev-libibverbs_1.2.1-3.4-2.0.0.0.bb | 6 +-
.../files/0001-Fix-build-with-clang.patch | 32 ++
...02-typecast-enum-to-int-before-comparison.patch | 115
Additional warnings found with clang
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
...-Disable-address-of-packed-member-warning.patch | 33 ++
.../efilinux/0002-initialize-char-pointers.patch | 33 ++
common/recipes-bsp/efilinux/efilinux_1.1.bb| 5 +++-
3 files c
These patches are interesting from upstreaming point of view as well
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
...01-bitWriter.cpp-Delete-unused-CACHEBYTES.patch | 27 +
.../0002-typecast-index-from-size_t-to-int.patch | 42 +++
...-invalid-offsetof-to-compiler-commandline.patch | 29 +
.../0
Will remove the patch file. Thanks.
From: Jussi Kukkonen [mailto:jussi.kukko...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 2:45 PM
To: Khor, Swee Aun
Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] xf86-video-mga: upgrade 1.6.4 -> 1.6.5
On 13 August 2017 at 21:22,
mailto:swee.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Wold, Saul wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 09:23 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Wold, Saul
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 21:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > >
>> > > These patches are interesting from upstreaming point of view
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 09:23 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Wold, Saul
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 21:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >
> > > These patches are interesting from upstreaming point of view as
> > > well
> > >
> > Khem,
> >
> > If they are good f
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Wold, Saul wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 21:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> These patches are interesting from upstreaming point of view as well
>>
> Khem,
>
> If they are good for Upstream, are you submitting them upstream, can
> you add Upstream-Status: ... to thes
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 21:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> These patches are interesting from upstreaming point of view as well
>
Khem,
If they are good for Upstream, are you submitting them upstream, can
you add Upstream-Status: ... to these patches please so we can track
them
Sau!
> Signed-off-by:
10 matches
Mail list logo