>> Use PACKAGECONFIG to optionally enable the numa option.
Looks good to go now.
BR,
Awais
From: California Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 2:18 AM
To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
Cc: Belal, Awais; California Sullivan
Subject: [meta-dpdk]
erged.
BR,
Awais
From: Cal Sullivan
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2018 2:26 AM
To: Belal, Awais; Kevin Hao
Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk][PATCH 2/2] dpdk: merge recipe and include
Hi Awais, Kevin,
In testing I ran into some compilation problems:
htt
urday, March 31, 2018 2:29 AM
To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
Cc: kexin....@windriver.com; Belal, Awais; California Sullivan
Subject: [meta-dpdk][PATCH] dpdk.inc: fix missing numa.h by disabling NUMA
options by default
Otherwise we get this:
| dpdk-18.02/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c:2
>> Is patch 1/2 good to merge?
> Yes.
Do we know when this will be merged?
BR,
Awais
From: Kevin Hao
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 6:25 AM
To: Cal Sullivan
Cc: Belal, Awais; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk][
look in near future hopefully.
Right now I am trying to send a patch to meta-intel@yoctoproject.org using git
send-email but it is failing with "550 5.7.1 Unable to relay", any pointers?
BR,
Awais
From: Cal Sullivan
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 20
Hi,
I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk package depends
on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it
uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the sources (the actual tarball pointed
to: does not exist) and the yocto mirror is used to f
