Hi Rhaul, Raymond:
Unfortunately, this is too late for the meta-intel-6.0 release, we
built the rc2 yesterday. I will work on merging this early next week to
master, but it won't be part of the morty release.
Sau!
On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 17:38 +0800, Rahul Kumar Gupta wrote:
> Dear Maintainer(s)
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:59 -0500, Paul Knopf wrote:
> Is the meta-intel layer the one I should be using for this
> motherboard?
>
> http://www.advantech.com/products/68ccaea2-9ff5-4f85-97f2-3d11244b0a0
> 8/aimb-275/mod_340f9d4a-17ed-44ac-9f00-5e96729ed7a7
>
> I am using an i7 6700 with a Q170 ch
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 01:33 +, Gupta, Rahul KumarXX wrote:
> Hi Saul,
>
> >
> > Unfortunately, this is too late for the meta-intel-6.0 release, we
> > built the rc2
> > yesterday. I will work on merging this early next week to master,
> > but it won't
> > be part of the morty release.
> >
>
On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 16:26 +0200, Ismo Puustinen wrote:
> In case "opengl" is missing from DISTRO_FEATURES, libva fails to
> satisfy
> its dependencies. The dependency check is done by BitBake when
> meta-world-pkgdata gathers information about all available packages
> during image builds, even if
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 23:26 +, Khem Raj wrote:
> Fixes fetch errors
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> ---
> common/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_16.11.bb | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_16.11.bb
> b/common/recipes-exte
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 20:27 -0500, wudping wrote:
> add libyami_1.0.1.bb and libyami-utils_1.0.1.bb files.
> Yami is core building block for media solution; libyami-utils has
> some Applications
> and Scripts for libyami.
>
Please split this into 2 patches one for each recipe and correct the
short
On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 13:28 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote:
> From: Christopher Larson
>
> corei7-64-intel-common overrides are used here, but this isn't in use
> when
> building for x32. Also obey this for corei7-64-x32-intel-common.
>
> An alternative would be to place this in intel-common-pk
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 12:27 +, Tony Whittam wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I don't know if this is too specialised for this list. I was directed
> to the Yocto Resources by Intel Premier Support. Anyway, no harm in
> asking the question :-)
>
Right, i
On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:36 +0200, Mikko Ylinen wrote:
> systemd-boot's EFI stub can be built in an EFI executable
> with the kernel, cmdline, and initrd.
>
> This commit enables the EFI stub code to use the RMC database
> and appends the board specific cmdline (KBOOTPARAM) to the
> built-in cmdli
On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:35 +0200, Mikko Ylinen wrote:
> This patchset enables to use runtime machine configuration (RMC) in
> systemd-boot's EFI stub too.
>
> I've been using Minnowboard Turbot boards (in addition to a 'broxton-
> m'
> board) in testing. However, the RMC data for Turbot was missi
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 06:24 +0200, Ran Shalit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In meta-intel readme in GIT, I see that it supports:
>
> - Intel-core2-32 Intel® Common Core BSP (Intel-core2-32)
> - Intel-core2-32 Intel® Common Core BSP (Intel-quark)
> - Intel-corei7-64 Intel® Common Core BSP (Intel-corei7-6
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 10:11 -0800, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> This one really scares me. Old version, removed CVE fixes, and might
> cause compatibility issues with other layers...
>
> Saul?
>
I thought that Alejandro was going to have another series that removed
the binutils?
Alejandro?
There was a
There is an existing bug open against a similar issue:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10597
It's being investigated.
Sau!
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 11:02 +0200, Ran Shalit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to try update to rt-kernel to I added the following in
> local.conf:
>
> #
Hold off on this, apparently the push they did to linux-intel-4.9 broke
forward compatibility
They are rebuilding the linux-intel repo
Sau!
On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 15:28 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
> This updates SRCREV moves the kernel to 4.9.12 and adds a number of
> patches
> and backports for th
On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 13:31 +0100, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source)
wrote:
> Hello
>
> The intel-gpu-tools calls for an x11dependency by default.
> Would any one have already done a setup compatible with Wayland, it
> would be of high interest for the AGL project.
>
Are you talking about addin
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:34 +0100, Dominig Ar Foll wrote:
> Oups my title was incorrect and misleading.
> I am after 4.10
We will have a 4.10 bbappend that will track the OE-Core 4.10 recipe
and SRCREVs, but the default default kernel for the 2.3 based meta-
intel will be the linux-intel 4.9 (LTS)
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 17:10 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote:
> On core2-32 and corei7-64, add thermald to MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jussi Laako
> ---
> conf/machine/intel-core2-32.conf | 2 +-
> conf/machine/intel-corei7-64.conf | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletio
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 11:39 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote:
> On 21.03.2017 01:59, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > The addition of kernel-modules is going to greatly increase the
> > size of
> > -minimal images for intel-corei7-64 and intel-core2-32, as these
> > configurations build a lot of modules. I thi
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 09:49 +0200, Mikko Ylinen wrote:
>
> On 21/03/17 20:08, Wold, Saul wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 11:39 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21.03.2017 01:59, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 11:36 +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> Without this the recipe fails to build without x11, breaking world
> build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen
> ---
> common/recipes-multimedia/libyami/libyami-utils_1.1.0.bb | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
Stephen,
I have reviewed the open bugs and closed the Cherry Hill/4.1 Race bug
as wont fix due to it being on older non-public hardware.
I am ready to release this if we do not need a CCB, otherwise please
start the CCB process for meta-intel release.
Sau!
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 12:23 +, Pe
Meta-Intel BSP Team:
Attached is the QA report for the meta-intel 7.0 release for Yocto
Project 2.3.
Based on the report and review of the outstanding and new bugs, I am
going to have the release team complete the release process on Tuesday,
unless I hear a negative response.
I have closed the
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 18:30 -0700, California Sullivan wrote:
> As is, invoking the executable through the EFI shell causes the
> kernel
> command line to be replaced. Typing "bootx64" as we often do, causes
> the
> kernel command line to be replaced with just "bootx64", for example.
> This causes
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 18:30 -0700, California Sullivan wrote:
> The EFI stub can be used to directly boot a kernel + initramfs.
> This addition was taken from meta-refkit.
>
> Signed-off-by: California Sullivan
> ---
> common/recipes-bsp/systemd-boot/systemd-boot_%.bbappend | 8
> 1 fil
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 13:19 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 18:47 -0700, California Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > Allows you to modify the command line when called from EFI shell
> > instead of the entire command line getting replaced.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: California Sullivan > >
My bad, I was looking on the wrong branch, I have this updated version
and willbe running it on the AB here shortly.
Sorry for the noise.
Sau!
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 10:22 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 08:00 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> > Use downloadfilename fetcher option t
Please review the
https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded
and
https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
On how to properly submit a patch to meta-intel@yoctoproject.org.
This is not correctly formatted and the internal 0003* patch doe
Well, sorry, but this is also not correct!
This commit message needs to be inside the patch you are creating below
and the this along with 2/2 should be 1 patch.
You can then submit this as you did the first version. Again, please
review the wiki links I sent you.
See below in the .patch dif
Anand,
I am sorry, I am going to have to reject this again, you did not
provide a properly formatted main commit message to the patch.
Again, please review: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Me
ssage_Guidelines
The commit message subject is poorly formatted and a one-line commit
me
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 19:42 -0700, Robert Yang wrote:
> Update it for cryptodev-module 1.9.
>
Not sure what happened, but I am getting the following failures in the
World build. I seem to be OK building this on a local machine.
http://yocto-ab-master.jf.intel.com:8012/builders/nightly-meta-inte
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 00:09 +, Wold, Saul wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 19:42 -0700, Robert Yang wrote:
> >
> > Update it for cryptodev-module 1.9.
> >
>
> Not sure what happened, but I am getting the following failures in
> the
> World build. I seem
This patch does not apply to the master branch of meta-intel, you need
to ensure this is against master please.
Thanks
Sau!
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 16:23 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif yed.mohamad.fa...@intel.com>
> ---
clear
security issue, normally we would back port patches to fix CVE issues.
Sau!
> Kind regards
> Johan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wold, Saul
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:31 AM
> To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
>
&g
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 22:35 +0300, Mikko Ylinen wrote:
> The scripts run in install target are relevant (and working)
> only if the driver installation is run on the build host.
>
> To fix build errors on some setups we add a patch that
> skips the scripts completely when cross-compiling.
>
Missi
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 13:21 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
wrote:
> From: Syed Johan Arif Bin Syed Mohamad Fauzi hamad.fa...@intel.com>
>
Almost there! There are a few more tweaks needed.
> Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
>
> ---
> .../recipes-kernel/intel-ether
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 13:21 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
wrote:
> removing in-tree ixgbe and ixgbevf kernel modules to enable out-of-
> tree ixgbe and ixgbevf modules from linux-intel
>
> Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif yed.mohamad.fa...@intel.com>
> ---
> common
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 21:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> These patches are interesting from upstreaming point of view as well
>
Khem,
If they are good for Upstream, are you submitting them upstream, can
you add Upstream-Status: ... to these patches please so we can track
them
Sau!
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 09:23 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Wold, Saul
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 21:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >
> > > These patches are interesting from upstreaming point of view as
> > > we
Thanks for this report, as stated below, we had one issue related to
the new iwlwifi and another parselog (bane of my existence at this
point).
The iwlwifi has been address and merged, so that bug can be closed, I
will not do an RC3.
I know the parselog issues are accumlating, some should get wh
On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 15:39 +0300, Mikko Ylinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 21/08/17 09:26, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif wrote:
> >
> > removing in-tree ixgbe and ixgbevf kernel modules to enable out-of-
> > tree ixgbe and ixgbevf modules from linux-intel
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fa
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 17:12 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
wrote:
> removing in-tree ixgbe and ixgbevf kernel module to enable out-of-
> tree ixgbe and ixgbevf module from linux-yocto 4.4
>
> Signed-off-by: Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif yed.mohamad.fa...@intel.com>
> ---
> comm
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 09:12 +0800, Lai Eddy wrote:
> I have just build and run Yocto(Pyro 2.3.1) Linux on my Xeon D1500
> board,
> I want to use the SOC's GPIO pins for a push button, so I use
> "bitbake linux-yocto -c menuconfig" to enable the
> "Device Drivers"-->"GPIO Support"-->"sysfs interfa
On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 14:26 -0700, California Sullivan wrote:
> Fix yocto project compatibility issue: was using raw _appends,
> without a
> machineoverride.
>
> Fix not pinning to a specific commit ID. The firmware could be
> updated,
> which would change the hash and break the build temporarily.
On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 16:07 +0800, Lai Eddy wrote:
> I have build and boot successfully the core-image-minial with
> MACHINE = "intel-corei7-64"
>
> but after I add according to http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cg
> i/meta-mono/about/?h=daisy
> IMAGE_INSTALL += " mono mono-helloworld"
> (also
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 12:54 +, Tan, Raymond wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Hatle [mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:30 PM
> > To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
> > Cc: Tan
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 09:11 +0300, Jussi Laako wrote:
> On 25.09.2017 10:00, Mikko Ylinen wrote:
> > On 23/09/17 01:03, Alejandro Hernandez wrote:
> > > When using DISTRO=poky-tiny we dont need to have thermald
> > > and also it brings about ~4MB of dependencies.
> >
> > It's conceptually not righ
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 19:41 +0200, Dominig Ar Foll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am seeing an issue with the ovmf license in AGL, since yocto has
> moved to Pyro.
> I can fix by deactivating it, but I do not understand why I see the
> error.
>
Hi Dominig,
I tried to build the AGL code based on the web
> > something to the image and then remove it, perhaps removing the
> > > recipe
> > > altogether? Not sure.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, 4 October 2017 4:38:27 AM NZDT Wold, Saul wrote:
> >
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 09:11 +, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
wrote:
> Please ignore this, I wasn't supposed to remove qat16
>
Why not?
We normally do not include multiple version of the same upstream in
order to avoid confusion, is there a specific reason we need to
maintain the qat16 v
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:32 +0800, Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
wrote:
> removed the following qat related binary files to avoid conflict when
> incorporating the meta-intel-qat layer
> 1) qat_c3xxx_mmp.bin
> 2) qat_c62x.bin
> 3) qat_c62x_mmp.bin
>
Is there a reason that the upstream linux-
can
> I get back to you on that later?
Thanks.
Sau!
> Hope this helps.
>
> Kind regards
> Johan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wold, Saul
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:38 PM
> To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Syed Mohamad Fauzi, Syed Johan Arif
>
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 23:39 +0800, Tan, Raymond wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel-
> > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Wold, Saul
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:09 PM
> > To: met
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 10:36 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> do_uefiapp_deploy copies files into the /boot directory of the rootfs
> and thus, like do_rootfs, should run under pseudo so that the files
> end up being owned by root.
>
> This did not trigger the uid leak check, perhaps because the task
>
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:13 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:35 +0000, Wold, Saul wrote:
> > Thanks, does this require a backport to Rocko/8.0.0 also?
>
> It's also broken there and it would be useful to backport it.
>
Pushed to master an
54 matches
Mail list logo