On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:13 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:35 +, Wold, Saul wrote:
> > Thanks, does this require a backport to Rocko/8.0.0 also?
>
> It's also broken there and it would be useful to backport it.
>
Pushed to master and rocko!
Thanks
Sau!
> --
> Best
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 17:35 +, Wold, Saul wrote:
> Thanks, does this require a backport to Rocko/8.0.0 also?
It's also broken there and it would be useful to backport it.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of I
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 10:36 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> do_uefiapp_deploy copies files into the /boot directory of the rootfs
> and thus, like do_rootfs, should run under pseudo so that the files
> end up being owned by root.
>
> This did not trigger the uid leak check, perhaps because the task
>
do_uefiapp_deploy copies files into the /boot directory of the rootfs
and thus, like do_rootfs, should run under pseudo so that the files
end up being owned by root.
This did not trigger the uid leak check, perhaps because the task runs
later.
For some (still unknown reason), sometimes the instal