On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 12:54 +, Tan, Raymond wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Hatle [mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:30 PM
> > To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
> > Cc: Tan, Raymond ; Wold, Saul
> >
> > Subject: DPDK
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Hatle [mailto:mark.ha...@windriver.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:30 PM
> To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
> Cc: Tan, Raymond ; Wold, Saul
>
> Subject: DPDK -- move to a separate sublayer
>
> I am looking at using the meta-intel v
I am looking at using the meta-intel version of DPDK for our customers, but
including all of meta-intel is problematic for me. (We currently have our own
dpdk layer and recipes -- which I'd like to get rid of.)
The issue is that DPDK is not Intel specific. Other architectures, vendors can
and do
