Re: [meta-ti][master/kirkstone][PATCH] conf: machine: j722s-evm: Update KERNERL_DEVICETREE_PREFIX to package fpdlink cam dtbos

On 3/25/2024 7:34 PM, Rahul T R wrote: j722s-evm supports capture from fpdlink cams via fpdlink fusion1 board or V3Link camera fusion board. So package fpdlink camera overlays Signed-off-by: Rahul T R Acked-by: Aniket Limaye --- meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/j722s-evm.conf | 6 +- 1

Re: [meta-ti] Dunfell branch EOL ?

On 3/25/2024 7:17 AM, mly...@hi-techniques.com wrote: There was an announcement in the #Yocto group about the Dunfell branch going to EOL. I was wondering, will TI still be pushing changes to that branch after it goes EOL or will changes only be pushed to different (newer) branch(s)? I'm

[meta-ti][master/kirkstone][PATCH] conf: machine: j722s-evm: Update KERNERL_DEVICETREE_PREFIX to package fpdlink cam dtbos

j722s-evm supports capture from fpdlink cams via fpdlink fusion1 board or V3Link camera fusion board. So package fpdlink camera overlays Signed-off-by: Rahul T R --- meta-ti-bsp/conf/machine/j722s-evm.conf | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[meta-ti] Dunfell branch EOL ?

There was an announcement in the #Yocto group about the Dunfell branch going to EOL. I was wondering, will TI still be pushing changes to that branch after it goes EOL or will changes only be pushed to different (newer) branch(s)? I'm asking because I've been using the Dunfell branch to build