Re: [meta-xilinx] Xilinx, why are you breaking the meta-xilinx-bsp layer?

2018-05-16 Thread Peter Smith
I need to do exactly the same thing in the next 2-3 months. Thanks for bringing this matter to the attention of the members of the mailing list. Best Regards Peter On Wed, 16 May 2018 at 16:20, Martin Lund wrote: > Hi Manju, > > Thank you for your answers - please see my

Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] bootbin: fix race condition in create_bif

2018-05-16 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
Hi Jean-Francois, > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Francois Dagenais [mailto:jeff.dagen...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 8:57 AM > To: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org; Manjukumar Harthikote Matha > > Cc: nat...@nathanrossi.com; Jean-Francois Dagenais

Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]

2018-05-16 Thread Martin Siegumfeldt
Hi Nathan, From: Nathan Rossi Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 13:20 To: Martin Siegumfeldt Cc: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1] On 16 May 2018 at 18:24, Martin Siegumfeldt

[meta-xilinx] [PATCH] bootbin: fix race condition in create_bif

2018-05-16 Thread Jean-Francois Dagenais
This problem was introduced by a622db96dd962c9a5ceb999ccd99da7ad7a40faf >From documentation of DEPENDS variable: [...]This mechanism is implemented by having do_configure depend on the do_populate_sysroot task of each recipe listed in DEPENDS[...] This is why the xilinx-bootbin:do_configure task

Re: [meta-xilinx] Xilinx, why are you breaking the meta-xilinx-bsp layer?

2018-05-16 Thread Martin Lund
Hi Manju, Thank you for your answers - please see my responses below. >> We are trying to put together a system built on top of the meta-xilinx-bsp >> layer >> and we have done so successfully up until the v2017.4 release with a few >> helpful >> patches from this excellent community. That is,

Re: [meta-xilinx] Yoctoproject vs Github

2018-05-16 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Hi Richard, On 16/05/2018 14:38, richard-bai...@sti-limited.com wrote: > Hi, > >   > > I was just wondering how the yoctoproject.org meta-xilinx relates to the > github hosted version. > > Is it a mirror or are there some changes? Is it updated immediately? Are > there any advantages to using

Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]

2018-05-16 Thread Martin Siegumfeldt
Hmm, thanks for your input Nathan... Br, Martin From: Nathan Rossi Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:01:02 PM To: Martin Siegumfeldt Cc: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1] On 16

Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]

2018-05-16 Thread Nathan Rossi
On 16 May 2018 at 22:43, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote: > So you have a distro configuration overriding a machine defined provider - I > did not see that coming, thanks for pointing that out. It seems to be of > version 2017.3: > > > martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ ll

[meta-xilinx] Yoctoproject vs Github

2018-05-16 Thread richard-bailey
Hi, I was just wondering how the yoctoproject.org meta-xilinx relates to the github hosted version. Is it a mirror or are there some changes? Is it updated immediately? Are there any advantages to using either? Thanks, Richard. Richard Bailey Senior Software Engineer T: +44 0203 393 1216

Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]

2018-05-16 Thread Martin Siegumfeldt
So you have a distro configuration overriding a machine defined provider - I did not see that coming, thanks for pointing that out. It seems to be of version 2017.3: martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ ll tmp/deploy/images/zcu102-zynqmp/pmu-* -rw-r--r-- 2 martin martin 129760 May 16 14:34

Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]

2018-05-16 Thread Nathan Rossi
On 16 May 2018 at 22:01, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > > > From: Nathan Rossi > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 13:20 > To: Martin Siegumfeldt > Cc: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx]

Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]

2018-05-16 Thread Nathan Rossi
On 16 May 2018 at 18:24, Martin Siegumfeldt wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > > I don't quite follow you here - the PMU provider of zcu102 is: > > > martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ cat > ../sources/meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-bsp/conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.conf | > grep

Re: [meta-xilinx] Provider of pmu-firmware [rel-v2018.1]

2018-05-16 Thread Martin Siegumfeldt
Hi Nathan, I don't quite follow you here - the PMU provider of zcu102 is: martin@dell:~/work/petalinux/build$ cat ../sources/meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-bsp/conf/machine/zcu102-zynqmp.conf | grep PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/pmu PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/pmu-firmware ?= "zynqmp-pmu-pmu-firmware"